Whither Political Economy? Evaluating the CORE Project as a Response to Calls for Change in Economics Teaching

Abstract

This article offers a critique of a major recent initiative in economics teaching: the CORE Project. CORE emerged in the wake of the global financial crisis, which was also something of a crisis for economics. The article deploys four evaluative criteria to pose four questions of CORE which address the demands of the student movement. CORE claims to be innovative and responding to criticisms. However, the article concludes that its reforms are relatively minor and superficial. CORE, like curricula which preceded the global financial crisis, still exhibits limited pluralism, ignores power and politics, and ignores key educational goals. Despite its opportunity to do so, CORE has not opened up space within economics for the teaching of political economy.

How Different is Heterodox Economists’ Thinking on Teaching? A Contrastive Evaluation of Interview Data

“…However, unless mainstream economics becomes more genuinely pluralist, educational philosophy and the goals of liberal education may remain neglected. This impression is reinforced by analysis of the new UK teaching governance framework (Mearman, Guizzo, and Berger 2018a) and the CORE Project (Mearman, Guizzo, and Berger 2018b), neither of which express a coherent teaching philosophy. In the introduction, we referred to a vision of the socially, ecologically, and ethically conscientious economist.…”

Economics and climate emergency

“…Stern, 2013). What we want to emphasize is that environmental economics has evolved through mainstream economics, and mainstream economics may have changed as a consequence, but it has not been transformed (see Mearman et al, 2018aMearman et al, , 2018bMorgan, 2015;Røpke, 2020;Söderbaum, 2018).…”

Unthinking knowledge production: from post-Covid to post-carbon futures

“…While critical and heterodox economists have recently started paying more attention to the role of (mainstream) economics discipline and economics teaching in reproducing conditions of capitalist exploitation (e.g. Mearman et al, 2018;Spash ed., 2017;Çalışkan & Callon, 2009;Callon, 2007), the organization of knowledge production in relation to broader socio-political context has remained somewhat underexplored. This essay contributes to the focus of this special issuethe role of economics in post-Covid, post-carbon futuresby offering a conceptualization of knowledge production that emphasizes its relationship to the legacies of capitalist extraction, in order to highlight how we might begin to overcome them in the future.…”