2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2011.03428.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White‐matter damage in a neonate with disseminated herpes simplex virus infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of HLH treatment is to suppress hyper inflammation. We reported a case of HSV infection with HLH, in which we could control hypercytokinemia with corticosteroids and cyclosporine (Kojima et al 2012). Melvin et al (2015) showed that no infants with plasma HSV concentrations ≤ 1 ×10 7 copies/µL died, and the concentrations of all infants who died were over 1 × 10 7 copies/µL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of HLH treatment is to suppress hyper inflammation. We reported a case of HSV infection with HLH, in which we could control hypercytokinemia with corticosteroids and cyclosporine (Kojima et al 2012). Melvin et al (2015) showed that no infants with plasma HSV concentrations ≤ 1 ×10 7 copies/µL died, and the concentrations of all infants who died were over 1 × 10 7 copies/µL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It occasionally involves renal failure (Capretti et al 2013), and some neonates need continuous renal replacement therapy (Funaki et al 2015). This disease is sometimes associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and anti-cytokine therapy is required (Janka and Schneider 2004;Suzuki et al 2009;Kojima et al 2012). We encountered a neonatal patient with disseminated HSV infection with high viral load and HLH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The usage of hmDNA as a biomarker for cancer detection is currently limited because it is difficult to distinguish hmDNA from nonmethylated DNA. Current methods include the use of methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, bisulfite conversion, , and affinity purification. However, the methods can result in DNA degradation upon bisulfite conversion, incomplete digestion when using a restriction enzyme digest, and selectivity issues during affinity purification. , The advantage of affinity purification is that it only involves a molecular recognition binding step followed by an elution step, thus requiring short assay times. Affinity purification of hmDNA is generally used to enrich a solution with hmDNA using beads of which the surfaces are modified with the methyl binding domain-2 (MBD2) protein. ,,, The MBD2 protein is used as a receptor that interacts with a methylated CpG (C*pG, ligand) with a dissociation constant of 3–66 nM. Furthermore, MBD2 has been demonstrated to have one of the best intrinsic binding selectivities among the proteins present within the MBD protein family, with dissociation constant values ranging between 188 and 6500 nM for nonmethylated CpG (CpG). , Despite this intrinsic binding selectivity of MBD2 for C*pG, the coenrichment of nonmethylated DNA upon the isolation of hmDNA remains one of the greatest limitations of MBD-based affinity methods. ,,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,15−17 The usage of hmDNA as a biomarker for cancer detection is currently limited because it is difficult to distinguish hmDNA from nonmethylated DNA. 18−23 Current methods include the use of methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, 24−26 bisulfite conversion, 27,28 and affinity purification. 29−31 However, the methods can result in DNA degradation upon bisulfite conversion, incomplete digestion when using a restriction enzyme digest, and selectivity issues during affinity purification.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach to differentiate between the two types of DNA is bisulfite conversion. [31,32] Using this chemical modification method, all non-methylated cytosines are converted into the base uracil, while all methylated cytosines remain unconverted. As a result, the base sequence of the nonmethylated DNA changes, allowing an easier differentiation using PCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%