2018
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ary110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which tools to use? Choice optimization in the tool-using ant, Aphaenogaster subterranea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite that two types of liquids were available for the ants at the same time, significantly more tools were dropped into honey‐water than into water. Our results are corroborated by other studies (Banschbach et al., 2006; Lőrinczi, 2014; Lőrinczi et al., 2018; Maák et al., 2017; McDonald, 1984), which also showed that the debris dropping behavior is selective when it comes to nonfood liquids such as water or petroleum jelly. If foraging workers had indeed considered liquids as a possible threat and they had dropped tools to avoid drowning or entanglement, we would have expected a similar amount of tools dropped into both liquids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite that two types of liquids were available for the ants at the same time, significantly more tools were dropped into honey‐water than into water. Our results are corroborated by other studies (Banschbach et al., 2006; Lőrinczi, 2014; Lőrinczi et al., 2018; Maák et al., 2017; McDonald, 1984), which also showed that the debris dropping behavior is selective when it comes to nonfood liquids such as water or petroleum jelly. If foraging workers had indeed considered liquids as a possible threat and they had dropped tools to avoid drowning or entanglement, we would have expected a similar amount of tools dropped into both liquids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These were mixed in equal volume, and a mixture of ca. 7 cm 3 was piled up 4 cm from the liquids to avoid the effect of distance during the object selection of ants (see Lőrinczi et al., 2018). In all 3 trials of Exp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we should acknowledge that in the present study we used only one type of tool. We know that Aphaenogaster ants are able to select among different types of tools according to their soaking capacity and the environmental context ( Maák et al, 2017 ; Lőrinczi et al, 2018 ) and that they learn to choose the optimal tools over successive trials ( Maák et al, 2017 ), therefore we cannot exclude that social learning could play a role in the process of tool selection, a possibility that awaits formal testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ants can learn to use artificial material that is novel to them and select the material with optimal soaking properties, thus showing that tool use is not behaviourally fixed in ants ( Maák et al, 2017 ). Tool selection also depends on the foraging environment and varies with food type (viscosity), distance, and availability of tools ( Lőrinczi et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%