2004
DOI: 10.1071/rd03076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which reproductive technologies are most relevant to studying, managing and conserving wildlife?

Abstract: The advent of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and embryo transfer in the 1970s led to speculation about the potential value of these and other 'reproductive technologies' to conserving endangered species. So far, and for the most part, assisted breeding techniques that are routine in domesticated species are not easily adapted to wildlife. Species differences in reproductive form (anatomy/morphology) and function (mechanisms regulating reproductive success) limit the practical applicability for offspring producti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
131
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Wildt (1992), the benefits of genome resource banking in wildlife include: facilitating the distribution of genetic material between populations, improving the efficiency of breeding programs (eliminating the transport of live animals, problems with mate preference, behavioural or sexual incompatibility, large population sizes), extending the generation interval of individuals indefinitely, and providing insurance against the loss of diversity. In non-domestic species, there have been numerous documented successes using AI (reviewed by Wildt 2004 andAndrabi andMaxwell 2007). More importantly, the technique has already been used successfully as a breeding-management tool in several species, such as the black-footed ferret and the cheetah .…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to Wildt (1992), the benefits of genome resource banking in wildlife include: facilitating the distribution of genetic material between populations, improving the efficiency of breeding programs (eliminating the transport of live animals, problems with mate preference, behavioural or sexual incompatibility, large population sizes), extending the generation interval of individuals indefinitely, and providing insurance against the loss of diversity. In non-domestic species, there have been numerous documented successes using AI (reviewed by Wildt 2004 andAndrabi andMaxwell 2007). More importantly, the technique has already been used successfully as a breeding-management tool in several species, such as the black-footed ferret and the cheetah .…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of AI in the tammar wallaby can therefore not simply be transposed to a different macropodid where these stages are not known. Although studies on male and female reproduction in CANDES have been carried out in a large number of species (reviewed by Pukazhenthi and Wildt 2004;Andrabi and Maxwell 2007), this number represents only a small fraction of the species currently in existence and is dominated by mammals, one of the least diverse taxonomic groups. Although the development of methods to monitor reproduction in specific CANDES is usually the first step in the application of ART, this relatively simple (compared to cloning or transgenesis) step has often been tedious, time consuming and costly to optimise and validate a specific method.…”
Section: Disadvantages and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations