2017
DOI: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which One is Better? Comparison of the Acute Inflammatory Response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado Scoring Systems

Abstract: PurposeAcute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of an acute abdomen. The accuracies of the Alvarado and the acute inflammatory response (AIR) scores in the diagnosis of appendicitis is very low in Asian populations, so a new scoring system, the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) system, was designed recently. We applied and compared the Alvarado, AIR, and RIPASA scores in the diagnoses of appendicitis in the Iranian population.MethodsWe prospectively compared the RIPASA, Alv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
43
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Goel et al [11], in India, evaluated the efficacy of the Alvarado score and the RIPASA score finding that the Alvarado score has a better specificity than the RIPASA score (100 vs. 50%) and also a better negative appendectomy rate (0 vs. 5%). Similar results were reported by Karami et al [12], in Iran, who found that the Alvarado score was 100% specific as compared with the RIPASA and the AIR scores (91.6% for both).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Goel et al [11], in India, evaluated the efficacy of the Alvarado score and the RIPASA score finding that the Alvarado score has a better specificity than the RIPASA score (100 vs. 50%) and also a better negative appendectomy rate (0 vs. 5%). Similar results were reported by Karami et al [12], in Iran, who found that the Alvarado score was 100% specific as compared with the RIPASA and the AIR scores (91.6% for both).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The AIRS uses the symptoms of vomiting, pain in the RIF, signs of abdominal defense, and a temperature >38.8°C, in addition to laboratory values indicating segmented neutrophils, and leukocyte and CRP values. [7] The AS and the AIRS criteria are illustrated in Table 1 and Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis sensitivity of the Alvarado score (AS) has been reported as 78.41%, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score (AIRS) as 78.41%, and the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scoring system (RIPASA) as 93.18%, while the diagnosis specificity has been reported as 100%, 91.67%, and 91.67%, respectively. [7] The severity of AA is generally evaluated radiologically. The white blood cell (WBC), CRP, and total bilirubin values, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the combination of radiology and laboratory scoring systems are used for severity evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under resource limited conditions, sophisticatedly and fully considering of clinical symptoms, signs and blood biomarkers could potentially help medical practitioners in decisionmaking for acute appendicitis patients [32]. And the biomarkers of blood in ammation are of great value in the diagnosis and pathological classi cation of acute appendicitis [20,21,33]. AI-assisted diagnosis of acute appendicitis may help clinicians to make better decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the timely diagnosis of acute appendicitis or even its pathological type through clinical manifestations and laboratory examinations become challenging but necessary. Several scoring systems have been developed to help clinicians with diagnosis of acute appendicitis, including the Alvarado, the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and the acute in ammatory response (AIR) scoring systems [17][18][19][20][21]. AIR is an index of acute in ammatory responses based on the Alvarado Score, which improves the accuracy of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%