1975
DOI: 10.1080/03680770.1974.11896129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where have all the Daphnia gone? The decline of a major cladoceran in Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the late 1960s populations of cladocerans dominated the crustacean zooplankton of the lake. After the introduction of the exotic invertebrate planktivore Mysis relicta, however; cladocerans (especially Daphnia) were eliminated from all but limited nearshore refugia by 197 1 (Richards et al 1975). Despite this massive disruption of zooplankton community structure and abundance, no major impacts on Lake Tahoe productivity, water quality, or phytoplankton species dynamics can be discerned in the long-term monitoring record for the lake , reflecting the fact that, even at peak abundances prior to Mysis, Daphnia densities never exceeded 0.75 animals liter', a density lower than the lowest treatment imposed in the Daphnia gradient experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the late 1960s populations of cladocerans dominated the crustacean zooplankton of the lake. After the introduction of the exotic invertebrate planktivore Mysis relicta, however; cladocerans (especially Daphnia) were eliminated from all but limited nearshore refugia by 197 1 (Richards et al 1975). Despite this massive disruption of zooplankton community structure and abundance, no major impacts on Lake Tahoe productivity, water quality, or phytoplankton species dynamics can be discerned in the long-term monitoring record for the lake , reflecting the fact that, even at peak abundances prior to Mysis, Daphnia densities never exceeded 0.75 animals liter', a density lower than the lowest treatment imposed in the Daphnia gradient experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. Miiller) was described as "quite common," and this led to the idea that Daphnia had been conspicuous in the plankton (Edmondson 1977b, Edmondson and Litt SEWAGE DIVERSION 1962196519701975197919331950195719621965197019751979 son, J, Braaten, D. J. Hall, C. Mills, D. Myhrc, C. Peterson, J. Shapiro, and M. and S. Willing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zooplankton, as other living components of any ecosystem, can be indicator organisms, or early warning systems of impending or current change. This was illustrated by the changes that occurred in the zooplankton population (and subsequently are occurring in such other organisms as fish in the Tahoe food web) after the introduction of the opossum shrimp, Mysis relicta in the early 1960s (Linn and Frantz 1965;Hansen 1966;Richards et al 1975Richards et al , 1991. Because of the sensitivity to change exhibited by this crustacean zooplankton and its importance within the food web as a major vehicle for transfer of energy from one trophic level to another (as a primary food source for fishes), it is advantageous to include them in future lake monitoring activities.…”
Section: Macrozooplankton Species Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This introduction was of limited success and was responsible for dramatically changing the makeup of the Lake Tahoe zooplankton food web (Richards et al 1975;Morgan et al 1978;Threlkeld et al 1980;Morgan et al 1981;Richards et al 1991). This resulted from the lack of knowledge by zooplankton ecologists at that time in understanding the full dietary role of the shrimp in large and deep oligotrophic lakes and how shrimp behavior (e.g., diurnal vertical migration) modified their utilization by fishes.…”
Section: Macrozooplankton Species Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%