2005
DOI: 10.17813/maiq.10.3.8360r760k3277t42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Do We Stand with Newspaper Data?

Abstract: We review the literature that identifies selection bias in media-based data and propose a theoretical model of the sources of these biases. Given the implications for validity and reliability, we conclude that newspaper data often do not reach acceptable standards for event analysis and that using them can distort findings and misguide theorizing. Furthermore, media selection biases are resistant to correction procedures largely because they are unstable across media sources, time, and location. We end with a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Newspaper and wire service data represent the best available source of systematic data on tax protest, as with many other forms of protest (Earl, Martin, McCarthy and Soule ). Nevertheless, newspaper coverage of protest events is subject to well‐known selection biases (Koopmans and Rucht ; McAdam and Su ; Oliver and Maney ; Oliver and Myers ; Ortiz, Myers, Walls and Diaz ). We designed our study to minimize these biases to the extent possible.…”
Section: The Comparative Tax Protest Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newspaper and wire service data represent the best available source of systematic data on tax protest, as with many other forms of protest (Earl, Martin, McCarthy and Soule ). Nevertheless, newspaper coverage of protest events is subject to well‐known selection biases (Koopmans and Rucht ; McAdam and Su ; Oliver and Maney ; Oliver and Myers ; Ortiz, Myers, Walls and Diaz ). We designed our study to minimize these biases to the extent possible.…”
Section: The Comparative Tax Protest Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data thus retrieved provide a sufficiently valid and reliable basis for the cross-national comparisons conducted here. Of course, they are not exempt from the description and selection biases of newspapers discussed in the methodological literature (see Earl et al 2004 andOrtiz et al 2005 for overviews). However, we can be quite confident about our findings.…”
Section: Data Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with almost any other method of social research, two main shortcomings stem from sources of bias in data collection (Tilly 2002 andHutter 2014). First, the selection bias, meaning that the protest events reported in the news might not be representative of the amount of protests that took place in reality (Oliver and Maney 2000;Earl et al 2004;Ortiz et al 2005;Hutter 2014). Second, the description bias, meaning that for various reasons news reports can contain mistaken, imprecise or incomplete descriptions of an event (Ortiz et al 2005;Tilly 2002).…”
Section: Protest Event Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%