When Would a State Crack Down on Fake News? Explaining Variation in the Governance of Fake News in Asia-Pacific

Abstract

This article sets out to explain national variation in the governance of fake news; it asks, under what conditions would governments pursue securitization in order to address the threat of fake news? Through a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 24 countries in Asia-Pacific, this article explores multicausal explanations behind why some countries have moved to securitize fake news—framing it as an existential threat and justifying the passing of laws that curtail civil liberties—while others do not. The analysis yields two main findings. First, although prevailing political arguments emphasize the threat of fake news to society and national security as justification for the securitization of fake news, this condition is neither necessary nor sufficient in causally accounting for the decision to crackdown on fake news. Conversely, crackdowns on fake news occur more frequently in countries less affected by fake news. Second, the analysis provides a set of two distinct, theoretically and empirically relevant causal pathways explaining the decision to crack down on fake news; the first pathway shows how non-democratic states without media freedom and which are relatively less affected by fake news instrumentalize the issue to restrict freedom of speech further; the second pathway shows how non-democratic states experiencing economic growth and political turbulence with proximate elections attempt to restrict freedom of speech. The findings suggest that implementations of broad legislation may not be an optimal approach, given that they appear to be more motivated by political circumstances than by the objective resolution of the problem.

Probing Tagore in 21st-century Bangladesh: Shifting Faces of Metaphysical Reality and the Role of New Media

“…In Southeast Asia's Islamic digital domains, ambivalence, dissatisfaction, and divisions have been investigated by Slama and Hoesterey (2021) and a complicated interaction between digital media and religion has been revealed. The influence of digital media on the growing disparities in newspaper and television news consumption has also been studied and the way how the introduction of digital media has altered patterns of news consumption with ramifications for socioeconomic inequality has been investigated (Neo, 2018). Dutta (2021) observed the usage of social media platforms, particularly Twitter, by firms in Islamic nations claiming that social media has become a crucial tool for businesses to engage with their consumers and disseminate company information.…”

Government, Religion and Fake News

“…In the intricate tapestry of contemporary society, the threads of fake news, governance, and religion are intricately woven, shaping the fabric of our collective understanding and perception. The phenomenon of fake news has become a potent force, influencing not only public discourse but also the dynamics between governments and religious institutions (Neo, 2022). This essay delves into the interconnected realms of fake news, governance, and religion, exploring their symbiotic relationship and the profound impact they wield on society.…”

Too Real to be Questioned: Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Spread of Online Scientific Rumors in China

“…In terms of rumor-related international articles, Neo (2022) studied the securitization of fake news through a fsQCA analysis and found a strong association between it and conditions of low media freedom, low democracy, good economic performance, political turbulence, and election proximity. X.…”