2013
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.681076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Sort of Girl Wants to Study Physics After the Age of 16? Findings from a Large-scale UK Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We designed student surveys to include items derived from established psychological constructs as well as our own items so that possible relationships between social influences, self-concept, and intrinsic and extrinsic factors could be explored. Research tends to focus on overall differences between boys and girls, rather than examining within-gender group variation and between-gender group overlap; our findings indicate that there are important differences among girls in terms of how they view physics (Mujtaba & Reiss, 2013b) and mathematics (Mujtaba & Reiss, 2016).…”
Section: The Context Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We designed student surveys to include items derived from established psychological constructs as well as our own items so that possible relationships between social influences, self-concept, and intrinsic and extrinsic factors could be explored. Research tends to focus on overall differences between boys and girls, rather than examining within-gender group variation and between-gender group overlap; our findings indicate that there are important differences among girls in terms of how they view physics (Mujtaba & Reiss, 2013b) and mathematics (Mujtaba & Reiss, 2016).…”
Section: The Context Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These findings suggest that the classroom environment can disadvantage girls within physics lessons and quite possibly may have an impact on physics subject choice in the longer term. Indeed, our multivariate analysis in another paper of an older cohort of students (within this same project) demonstrated that teachers not encouraging students to continue with physics post-16 was negatively associated with aspirations to study physics post-16 (Mujtaba & Reiss, 2013a, 2013b. More positively, of course, the classroom environment provided by teachers can encourage students to continue with a subject once it is no longer compulsory, and there is now a developing literature that provides specific guidance for classroom teachers (e.g., Institute of Physics, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the international literature, this instrumental value of physics is the most influential factor which predicts students' physics enrolment plans (e.g., Barnes 1999;Eccles et al 1998;Mujtaba and Reiss 2013;Stokking 2000). Specifically in Australia, perceived instrumental value of physics has been suggested as the largest predictor of physics enrolment in senior secondary schools (e.g., Barnes 1999;Woods 2008), and any decline in this value is found to negatively influence the enrolment pattern (Lyons and Quinn 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Likewise, the perceived difficulty level of the subject is another major negative influence on student enrolment plans (Spall et al 2003). For females, another competing factor influencing their decision to study physics is the gender-biased stereotypes affiliated with the subject such that it is perceived to be a course and career path that is not as suitable for females as it is for males (Bultitude et al 2010;Mujtaba and Reiss 2013). Gill and Bell (2013) reported that even among high achieving students, there exists the widely held belief that physics is a subject for boys, and this prevailing attitude contributes to lower participation of females in this subject.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When the related literature has been scrutinized, there are some studies that emphasize the importance of relationship between students' attitudes towards science and physics with self-regulation strategies and motivational beliefs (Demir, Öztürk & Dökme, 2012;Mujtaba, & Reiss, 2013;Pendergast, Lieberman-Betz & Vail, 2017;Reid & Skryabina, 2002;Uzun & Keleş, 2012;Yamaç, 2011;Yaman & Dede, 2007;Yenice, Saydam & Telli, 2012;Zhang, Ding, & Mazur, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%