2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0953-5438(02)00063-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
171
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
171
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of usability can cause problems in varying degrees of severity, such as frustration and time wasting (Mack & Sharples, 2009). Beyond the general usability of a product, it has been shown that aesthetics, emotion, and expectations also influence the user's experience (Lindgaard & Dudek, 2003). Several studies suggest that other features have priority over usability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of usability can cause problems in varying degrees of severity, such as frustration and time wasting (Mack & Sharples, 2009). Beyond the general usability of a product, it has been shown that aesthetics, emotion, and expectations also influence the user's experience (Lindgaard & Dudek, 2003). Several studies suggest that other features have priority over usability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it has been advocated that there are two structural dimensions underlying emotion (arousal, valence), or even three such dimensions (arousal, valence, and dominance) (Mehrabian & Russel, 1977;Westbrooke & Oliver, 1991). However, in consumer ergonomics there is no theoretical concept of user emotion that is generally agreed upon and various methods are applied to measure the user's emotional reaction to product use (Lindgaard & Dudek, 2003).…”
Section: Cultural Ergonomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the eye, its close links with the brain and models of perceptual mechanisms, make it likely that eye movements have a contribution to make in the assessment of satisfaction. To date researchers involved with the assessment of satisfaction have used interviews and questionnaires (Lindgaard and Dudek, 2003) making the results problematic and subjective as the results obtained may be unreliable due to memory degradation and/or rational reconstruction by the user. An objective measure of satisfaction which cannot be seriously influenced by the user would therefore be a useful addition to the usability evaluator"s tool box.…”
Section: Pmentioning
confidence: 99%