1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the nature of increased Stroop interference in schizophrenia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we also demonstrate a single chemical (NAA)-cognitive network in the brain, specifically in ACC, as a possible neurobiological/neurochemical mechanism for development of cognitive interference. Given that the SCW interference has been found abnormal in several neuropsychiatric disorders, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] this neuroimaging/cognitive tool may be useful for documentation of interference in studying cognitive control mechanisms in general, and in diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders particularly where dysfunction of cingulate cortex is expected. Another valuable application of these findings might be a new drug development in the pharmaceutical industry to design new chemical compounds and drugs which would produce brain changes that would be reflected in the interference and NAA measures (eg, in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, where dysfunction of the ACC was already revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop; 4 or in obsessive-compulsive disorder, where reduced levels of cingulate NAA have been found using 1 H-MRS 48 ) and as an imaging tool to study effects of these chemical compounds and drugs (eg, as a guide in pre-clinical and early clinical development of drug candidates, and as proof of the effectiveness of new drugs as well as decisions on their future development).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we also demonstrate a single chemical (NAA)-cognitive network in the brain, specifically in ACC, as a possible neurobiological/neurochemical mechanism for development of cognitive interference. Given that the SCW interference has been found abnormal in several neuropsychiatric disorders, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] this neuroimaging/cognitive tool may be useful for documentation of interference in studying cognitive control mechanisms in general, and in diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders particularly where dysfunction of cingulate cortex is expected. Another valuable application of these findings might be a new drug development in the pharmaceutical industry to design new chemical compounds and drugs which would produce brain changes that would be reflected in the interference and NAA measures (eg, in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, where dysfunction of the ACC was already revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop; 4 or in obsessive-compulsive disorder, where reduced levels of cingulate NAA have been found using 1 H-MRS 48 ) and as an imaging tool to study effects of these chemical compounds and drugs (eg, as a guide in pre-clinical and early clinical development of drug candidates, and as proof of the effectiveness of new drugs as well as decisions on their future development).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other parts of the network depend on task demands, such as the posterior parietal cortex and the frontal eye fields for spatial selective attention. In schizophrenia selective attention has been shown to be disturbed in a variety of tasks [43] . It has been a matter of debate whether the primary focus of the disturbance is to be found in sensory areas or in the network for top-down attentional control.…”
Section: Inner Time Consciousness -Working Memory Attention and Prepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudios previos han observado estas disociaciones entre las dos versiones cuando se mide la atención en pacientes esquizofrénicos (Boucart, Mobarek, Cuervo, & Danion, 1999). Boucart et al (1999) han señalado que existen importantes diferencias metodológicas entre las dos versiones.…”
unclassified
“…Boucart et al (1999) han señalado que existen importantes diferencias metodológicas entre las dos versiones. Mientras que en la versión computerizada los estímulos son presentado uno a uno en la pantalla, en la versión de tarjetas todos los estímulos se presentan simultáneamen-te, teniendo el sujeto que seleccionar el target actual a través de un gran número de distractores.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation