2020
DOI: 10.36660/ijcs.20200272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the best Cardiovascular Risk Score for the Brazilian Population?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated that adding the variables premature family history of cardiovascular events, exercise test parameters, and markers of subclinical a positive family history, the addition of other variables to the risk score may identify and benefit those most vulnerable to cardiovascular events. 39 Several variables have been proposed for reclassification of cardiovascular risk estimated by the FRS, 3,27,29 varying from simple clinical history to more complex methods that are expensive or require advanced technology, such as cardiac imaging tests. The variables analyzed in the present study were previously shown to be associated with severe outcomes, 3,11,[16][17][18]23,26,29 including death, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study demonstrated that adding the variables premature family history of cardiovascular events, exercise test parameters, and markers of subclinical a positive family history, the addition of other variables to the risk score may identify and benefit those most vulnerable to cardiovascular events. 39 Several variables have been proposed for reclassification of cardiovascular risk estimated by the FRS, 3,27,29 varying from simple clinical history to more complex methods that are expensive or require advanced technology, such as cardiac imaging tests. The variables analyzed in the present study were previously shown to be associated with severe outcomes, 3,11,[16][17][18]23,26,29 including death, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%