2010
DOI: 10.1002/uog.7743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of facial clefts?

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique proved able to correctly distinguish unilateral and midline from bilateral defects, as well as involvement of the anterior palate and alveolar processes from involvement of the secondary palate [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The technique proved able to correctly distinguish unilateral and midline from bilateral defects, as well as involvement of the anterior palate and alveolar processes from involvement of the secondary palate [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…32 In addition to the precise evaluation of the maxillofacial anatomy and a demonstration of the extent of the defect (cleft lip, alveus, palate), associated anomalies can also be depicted. Besides T2W and SSFP sequences ( Figure 5), EPI sequences ( Figure 11) are best used to study the defects.…”
Section: Pathologies Involving Bonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ce qui concerne les anomalies faciales, l'IRM est limité e, excepté pour le degré d'extension posté rieure d'une fente labiopalatine [24] et est surtout ré alisé e pour rechercher d'autres é lé ments syndromiques, surtout cé ré braux [25].…”
Section: Une Irm : Quand ?unclassified