volume 10, issue 2, P86-96 2014
DOI: 10.1177/1747016114523771
View full text
|
|
Share

Abstract: The first objective of this article is to demonstrate that ethics committee members can learn a great deal from a forensic analysis of two classic psychology studies: Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study and Milgram's Obedience Study. Rather than using hindsight to retrospectively eradicate the harm in these studies, the article uses a prospective minimization of harm technique. Milgram attempted to be ethical by trying to protect his subjects through debriefing and a follow-up survey. He could have done more, how…

Expand abstract

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

0
0
0
0
0

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals