What bilateral displays do

Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: What you get is often not what you see.

“…It should be noted, however, that our findings do not rule out variations of the direct access model (e.g., Boles, 1990;Hines, 1975;Iacoboni & Zaidel, 1996), in which each word is analyzed independently in the hemisphere that first receives it. However, the findings do suggest that if righthemisphere processes of word perception exist, they can be completely dominated by left-hemisphere processes.…”

Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: What you get is often not what you see.

“…It should be noted, however, that our findings do not rule out variations of the direct access model (e.g., Boles, 1990;Hines, 1975;Iacoboni & Zaidel, 1996), in which each word is analyzed independently in the hemisphere that first receives it. However, the findings do suggest that if righthemisphere processes of word perception exist, they can be completely dominated by left-hemisphere processes.…”

Bilateral stimulus presentation in memory scanning.

“…There was no evidence that bilateral presentation increased visual-field differences. This is not consistent with Boles' (1983, 1990) hypothesis that visual-field asymmetry effects are more pronounced with bilateral than with unilateral presentation of stimuli.…”

Bilateral field interactions and hemispheric asymmetry in number comparison

“…Although bilateral stimulus displays have been reported to increase the power to detect VHF differences (e.g. [7,10,14]), none of our experiments provided evidence for strong VHF differences in number comparison. Only Arabic digits resulted in a marginally significant LVF advantage of 20 ms.…”

Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: What you get is often not what you see.

“…It should be noted, however, that our findings do not rule out variations of the direct access model (e.g., Boles, 1990;Hines, 1975;Iacoboni & Zaidel, 1996), in which each word is analyzed independently in the hemisphere that first receives it. However, the findings do suggest that if righthemisphere processes of word perception exist, they can be completely dominated by left-hemisphere processes.…”

Bilateral stimulus presentation in memory scanning.

“…There was no evidence that bilateral presentation increased visual-field differences. This is not consistent with Boles' (1983, 1990) hypothesis that visual-field asymmetry effects are more pronounced with bilateral than with unilateral presentation of stimuli.…”

Bilateral field interactions and hemispheric asymmetry in number comparison

“…Although bilateral stimulus displays have been reported to increase the power to detect VHF differences (e.g. [7,10,14]), none of our experiments provided evidence for strong VHF differences in number comparison. Only Arabic digits resulted in a marginally significant LVF advantage of 20 ms.…”

Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: What you get is often not what you see.

“…It should be noted, however, that our findings do not rule out variations of the direct access model (e.g., Boles, 1990;Hines, 1975;Iacoboni & Zaidel, 1996), in which each word is analyzed independently in the hemisphere that first receives it. However, the findings do suggest that if righthemisphere processes of word perception exist, they can be completely dominated by left-hemisphere processes.…”

Bilateral stimulus presentation in memory scanning.

“…There was no evidence that bilateral presentation increased visual-field differences. This is not consistent with Boles' (1983, 1990) hypothesis that visual-field asymmetry effects are more pronounced with bilateral than with unilateral presentation of stimuli.…”

Bilateral field interactions and hemispheric asymmetry in number comparison

“…Although bilateral stimulus displays have been reported to increase the power to detect VHF differences (e.g. [7,10,14]), none of our experiments provided evidence for strong VHF differences in number comparison. Only Arabic digits resulted in a marginally significant LVF advantage of 20 ms.…”