What Bigots Do Say: A Reply to DiFranco

Abstract

Neutral Counterpart Theories of slurs hold that the truth‐conditional contribution of a slur is the same as the truth‐conditional contribution of its neutral counterpart. In (2015), DiFranco argues that these theories, even if plausible for single‐word slurs like ‘kike’ and ‘nigger’, are not suitable for complex slurs such as ‘slanty‐eyed’ and ‘curry muncher’, figurative slurs like ‘Jewish American Princess’, or iconic slurring expressions like ‘ching chong’. In this paper, we argue that these expressions do not amount to genuine counterexamples to neutral counterpart theories of slurs. We provide a positive characterization of DiFranco's examples that doesn't deviate from the core of those theories.

Slurs, Stereotypes and Insults

“…See also Díaz Legaspe (2018) for considerations in favor of restricting the thesis in the case of some kind of slurs, the so-called 'normalising' ones. For a general defence, seeCaso and Lo Guercio (2016).6 See, for instance,Potts (2005),McCready (2010) andSchlenker (2007).Slurs, Stereotypes and Insults…”