2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3046352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WH-MOEA: A Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Wiener-Hammerstein System Identification. A Novel Approach for Trade-Off Analysis Between Complexity and Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the target system is SIMO with two outputs, two output models to describe the dynamics of MWO and MSP are developed independently. The discrete prediction equation is used as a prediction model of each output as follows [21],…”
Section: Development Of the Discrete Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the target system is SIMO with two outputs, two output models to describe the dynamics of MWO and MSP are developed independently. The discrete prediction equation is used as a prediction model of each output as follows [21],…”
Section: Development Of the Discrete Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Анализ компромисса между точностью и сложностью уже использовался для идентификации моделей на основе обработки набора измерений характеристик моделируемого явления и при идентификации моделей Винера - Гаммерштейна [12]. Многокритериальный генетический алгоритм, который позволяет несколькими критериями влиять на выбор структур -кандидатов модели, применяется при идентификации полиномиальных моделей для реальной нелинейной системы и позволяет лучше выбирать окончательную идентифицированную модель [13].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Pareto fronts of each design concept allows a more in-depth analysis to select the most appropriate model according to the user's needs. As in the previous chapters, this chapter is a literal transcription with minor modifications of the following research publication[120]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%