2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-021-00689-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weil positivity and trace formula the archimedean place

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prolate spheroidal wave functions play a key role in refs. 1 – 3 in relation to the Riemann zeta function. In all these applications, they appear as eigenfunctions of the angle operator between two orthogonal projections in the Hilbert space of even square integrable function on .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prolate spheroidal wave functions play a key role in refs. 1 – 3 in relation to the Riemann zeta function. In all these applications, they appear as eigenfunctions of the angle operator between two orthogonal projections in the Hilbert space of even square integrable function on .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. 2 , the compression of f ( S ) to Sonin’s space ( 11 ) (which consists of functions such that was shown to be (for λ = 1) the root of Weil’s positivity at the Archimedean place on test functions supported in the interval , but, since Sonin’s space is not preserved by scaling, one could not restrict scaling to this space. It turns out that commutes with the orthogonal projection on Sonin’s space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yoshida proved without any assumption that the hermitian form ⟨⋅, ⋅⟩ 𝑊 is positive definite on 𝐾(𝑎) if 𝑎 > 0 is sufficiently small ([33, Lemma 2]). Connes-Consani [4] provides an operator theoretic conceptual reason for this result. Yoshida also proved that, for given 𝑎 0 > 0 and 𝜇 > 0, there exists 𝑁 ⩾ 0 such that ⟨𝜙, 𝜙⟩ 𝑊 ⩾ 𝜇‖𝜙‖ 𝐿 2 for every 𝜙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑁 (𝑎) and 0 < 𝑎 ⩽ 𝑎 0 ([33, Lemma 3]).…”
Section: Yoshida's Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Yoshida proved without any assumption that the hermitian form ·,·W$\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle _W$ is positive definite on Kfalse(afalse)$K(a)$ if a>0$a&gt;0$ is sufficiently small ([33, Lemma 2]). Connes–Consani [4] provides an operator theoretic conceptual reason for this result. Yoshida also proved that, for given a0>0$a_0&gt;0$ and μ>0$\mu &gt;0$, there exists N0$N \geqslant 0$ such that false⟨ϕ,ϕfalse⟩Wμfalse∥ϕfalse∥L2$\langle \phi ,\phi \rangle _W \geqslant \mu \Vert \phi \Vert _{L^2}$ for every ϕKN(a)$\phi \in K_N(a)$ and 0<aa0$0&lt;a \leqslant a_0$ ([33, Lemma 3]).…”
Section: Preparations For the Proof Of Theorem 14mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation