2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weekly docetaxel monotherapy for advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in combination with capecitabine [4], 5-fluorouracil [5] or S-1 [6] oxaliplatin is the most commonly used form of platinum derivatives for the treatment of GC. Most GC patients receive chemotherapy doublets [7], but less intensive chemotherapy regimens may be preferred in some circumstances due to e.g., suboptimal patient performance status [8]. In the past, tri-drug chemotherapy, such as a combination of EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine) [9] or DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil) [10], was considered the standard of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in combination with capecitabine [4], 5-fluorouracil [5] or S-1 [6] oxaliplatin is the most commonly used form of platinum derivatives for the treatment of GC. Most GC patients receive chemotherapy doublets [7], but less intensive chemotherapy regimens may be preferred in some circumstances due to e.g., suboptimal patient performance status [8]. In the past, tri-drug chemotherapy, such as a combination of EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine) [9] or DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil) [10], was considered the standard of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 Docetaxel (D) has shown activity in GC without evidence of cross‐resistance with platinum compounds. 12 , 13 , 14 When combined with C and F (DCF) in a 3‐weekly regimen, it increases response rate (RR), median time to progression (mTTP), and mOS as compared to CF, but at the cost of higher rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (69% vs. 59%) and febrile neutropenia (FN) (29% vs. 12%). 15 Therefore, routine use of DCF in clinical practice for patients with advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma remains limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%