1994
DOI: 10.1177/000992289403300709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WeeFIM

Abstract: A cross-sectional community sample of 417 children, ages 6 months to 8 years without developmental delays or in developmental programs, was seen. The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) was used to assess independence in self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Mean total WeeFIM was similar for males and females. There was a significant correlation between the age of the child in months and total WeeFIM scores for children ages 2 to 5 years (n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WeeFIM has been validated in children with normal development 13 , developmental disabilities 14,15 , and acquired brain injury 15 . While the WeeFIM was initially designed to describe major levels of independence across typically developing children aged 6 months to 8 years 13 , it has been validated for use in adolescents with cerebral palsy up to age 16 years 16 and is commonly used to evaluate older children and young adults with TBI up to 21 years of age 1,17,18 . Raw scores on the WeeFIM range from 18 to 126.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WeeFIM has been validated in children with normal development 13 , developmental disabilities 14,15 , and acquired brain injury 15 . While the WeeFIM was initially designed to describe major levels of independence across typically developing children aged 6 months to 8 years 13 , it has been validated for use in adolescents with cerebral palsy up to age 16 years 16 and is commonly used to evaluate older children and young adults with TBI up to 21 years of age 1,17,18 . Raw scores on the WeeFIM range from 18 to 126.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the wide age range of children evaluated in the current study and the effect of age on WeeFIM ratings in children below the age of 7 years due to the developmental nature of the functional abilities assessed 13 , WeeFIM DFQs 19 were used as the measure of functional status in all data analyses. DFQs reflect percent of “normal” or “age-appropriate” functioning, allowing comparison across age groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the behavioral assessment is intrinsically harder, due to the yet limited behavioral repertoire of infants and very young children [16,17], the dependence of outcome on the age at injury [18,19], and the overlap of the evolution of the CS with the physiological growth curve [20][21][22]. Normative datasets for adjusting young children's scores are often needed (e.g., [23]), though not always available, and the outcome prediction is then drawn by inference from adult data. However, at least among children with traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is initial support for the use of command following as a predictor for emergence to CS [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Zoccolillo et al [10] employed a group of Kinect-based games for the rehabilitation of cerebral palsy patients and used the QUEST and ABILHAND-kids score measures to compare the body structure and function and the activity level before and after the game-based rehabilitation. Acar et al [45] have also used the QUEST and ABILHAND-Kids score measures as well as the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test [46] and the Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM) [47] to evaluate the enhancement in the body structure and function and the activity level achieved by using a set of Nintendo Wii games as rehabilitation tools for cerebral palsy patients. Compared with these previous studies, the current study is characterized by the use of a computerized assessment method to achieve automatic evaluation of the movements performed by cerebral palsy patients during their engagement in game-based rehabilitation exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%