2001
DOI: 10.1002/cfg.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Website Review: pathway databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several reviews on the biochemical pathway databases are published in the literatures focusing on the analysis of cell signaling pathways and are found to be more vocal toward the discussions of the challenges that have been faced by the authors while collating and normalizing the pathway data from various resources. Meanwhile, few review articles, dedicatedly focusing on the metabolic pathway databases, are also published by highlighting their pros and cons, whereas a very few discuss on both metabolic and signaling pathway databases ( 22–27 ). Besides these reviews, the benefits, limitations and the challenges of few signaling pathway databases, mainly KEGG ( 1 ), REACTOME ( 28 ), PANTHER ( 29 ), NCI-PID ( 30 ), WikiPathways ( 31 ) and associated tools in the context of data collation for developing dynamic or quantitative model of signaling pathways are also reviewed ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several reviews on the biochemical pathway databases are published in the literatures focusing on the analysis of cell signaling pathways and are found to be more vocal toward the discussions of the challenges that have been faced by the authors while collating and normalizing the pathway data from various resources. Meanwhile, few review articles, dedicatedly focusing on the metabolic pathway databases, are also published by highlighting their pros and cons, whereas a very few discuss on both metabolic and signaling pathway databases ( 22–27 ). Besides these reviews, the benefits, limitations and the challenges of few signaling pathway databases, mainly KEGG ( 1 ), REACTOME ( 28 ), PANTHER ( 29 ), NCI-PID ( 30 ), WikiPathways ( 31 ) and associated tools in the context of data collation for developing dynamic or quantitative model of signaling pathways are also reviewed ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, only 18 pathway Web sites were active. 48 Today, PathGuide.org references more than 290 pathway resources categorized by availability, data access methods, tools, organisms, network category, and contents. More than 30 million molecular interactions are accessible via the Internet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 More than 1400 curated, experimentally determined, metabolic pathways and enzyme data for microbial, plant, and vertebrate metabolism are available from the freely accessible MetaCyc database. 51 There are commercial and publicly available databases of molecular interactions, 52 biological pathways, 48,53,54 and genomic correlates. 55 The Signal Transduction Knowledge Environment lists 49 canonical pathways with 1084 component molecules and 33 pathways specific to a particular organism, tissue, or cell type with 718 components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%