2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable biomolecule smartsensors based on one-step fabricated berlin green printed arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent Michaelis–Menten constant ( K app m ) of the all-inkjet-printed glucose biosensor was estimated to be 887 μM using the electrochemical version of the Lineweaver–Burk equation (Figure S23). A low value of 887 μM of the all-inkjet-printed glucose biosensor suggests that the enzyme electrode possessed high affinity, as well as high enzyme catalytic activity toward glucose molecules. …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent Michaelis–Menten constant ( K app m ) of the all-inkjet-printed glucose biosensor was estimated to be 887 μM using the electrochemical version of the Lineweaver–Burk equation (Figure S23). A low value of 887 μM of the all-inkjet-printed glucose biosensor suggests that the enzyme electrode possessed high affinity, as well as high enzyme catalytic activity toward glucose molecules. …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 140,160,184 ] Owing to advancement of materials, fabrication techniques, and sampling approaches, a number of skin‐interfaced biosensors have been validated for their real‐time CGM in sweat during physiological activities ( Figure ). [ 135–161,185 ] Electrochemical sensors are the most commonly used method for wearable device design owing to their high sensitivity and simplicity, low‐cost fabrication, high speed, and high analytical performance. [ 186–188 ] Several strategies have been developed to optimize the on‐body sensing capability of these wearable electrochemical sensors.…”
Section: Emergence Of On‐body Wearable Glucose Continuous Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve painless and harmless self-monitoring of diabetes, noninvasive wearable sensors (e.g., sweat, saliva, tear, etc.) with high selectivity and a low detection limit have been put forward. Generally, they could be divided into two categories, enzymatic biosensors and enzyme-free biosensors. Compared with enzymatic biosensors, an enzyme-free sensing platform has the properties of nonenzyme immobilization, simple operation, and reusability, which would be helpful for noninvasive wearable analytical detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%