2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2019.105983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear particle dynamics drive the difference between repeated and non-repeated reciprocated sliding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polymer contact area is up to 70% of the nominal value at the yield, independent of the roughness. Wear debris entrapment in annular contacts [317], particle dynamics in reciprocated sliding [318], and particle emission from Cu-free brake materials [319] are investigated respectively. These experiments showed that wear decreased with the ring width for aluminum samples while no clear correlation between ring width and total mass loss or steady-state wear rate for steel samples, non-repeated sliding gave rise to a reduced debris formation instead a steady increase in friction, and Cu-free brake pads generated more airborne particles than Cu-contained brake pad.…”
Section: Materials Transfer and Wear Debris Dynamics In Wear Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polymer contact area is up to 70% of the nominal value at the yield, independent of the roughness. Wear debris entrapment in annular contacts [317], particle dynamics in reciprocated sliding [318], and particle emission from Cu-free brake materials [319] are investigated respectively. These experiments showed that wear decreased with the ring width for aluminum samples while no clear correlation between ring width and total mass loss or steady-state wear rate for steel samples, non-repeated sliding gave rise to a reduced debris formation instead a steady increase in friction, and Cu-free brake pads generated more airborne particles than Cu-contained brake pad.…”
Section: Materials Transfer and Wear Debris Dynamics In Wear Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the field application matters: for skis, sleds, tires and other systems of interest, the ice or snow experiences brief, one-pass contact by the slider. The substrate's initial response should be of particular interest, and the friction mechanics could be quite different from those governing after repeated passes (Hsia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Evidence Of Ice-and Snow-friction Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscara and Sinnott 16 took advantage of the X-Y table motion of a machine tool to perform abrasive wear testing of 6.3 mm diameter pins in parallel neighboring raster passes each of 0.45 m length across a counter-body surface, and Berns and Fischer 17 proposed such a scanning motion approach for studying the abrasive wear of hard facing alloys using similarly large diameter (6 mm) specimens and enabling a single-pass raster sliding track of 50 m length. Beyond other such examples of mesoscale rastered wear track testing of that era, 18,19 automated multi-directional drives are becoming more commonly implemented in commercially available wear test stands and micro-tribometers, and increasing use of such non-repeated or indexed reciprocated raster scanning 20,21 they enable may be anticipated. In the extreme case, such raster scanning is the motion of atomic force microscopes (AFMs), which in addition to imaging is being used not only for friction but also for nano-scale wear testing with a model single-asperity contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%