Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment

Dağdeviren, Metin; Yavuz, Serkan; Kılınç, Nevzat

doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016

Cited by 654 publications

(363 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

349

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…TOPSIS, finans yatırımlarından üretim sistemlerine kadar çok kriterli karar vermenin gerektiği gerçek dünya problemleri ile akademik araştırmalarda sıkça kullanılmaktadır [9]. TOPSIS'in uygulandığı problemler arasında aday değerlendirme [17], konteyner limanlarının yönetimi [18], eğitim stratejisi belirlenmesi [19], silah seçimi [20], uzman personel seçimi [21] imalat işçisi seçimi [22], ürün tasarımı [23], imalat yöntemi seçimi [24], bina enerji performansı İdeal çözüme göreceli yakınlık değerlerinin hesaplanması. Öklid Uzaklığı: İki nokta arasındaki uzaklık, bu iki noktayı birleştiren doğrunun uzaklığıdır.…”

Section: Topsis Yöntemi̇ (Topsis Technique)unclassified

Farkli Uzaklik Hesaplama Yaklaşimlarinin Topsis Üzeri̇nde Kullanilabi̇li̇rli̇ği̇ni̇n İncelenmesi̇

Kabak¹,

Sağlam²,

Aktas³

2017

Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Topsis Yöntemi̇ (Topsis Technique)unclassified

Farkli Uzaklik Hesaplama Yaklaşimlarinin Topsis Üzeri̇nde Kullanilabi̇li̇rli̇ği̇ni̇n İncelenmesi̇

Kabak¹,

Sağlam²,

Aktas³

2017

Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…AHP allows decision makers to model complex problems in a hierarchical structure that demonstrates the relationships among the problem's goal, main criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives (Saaty, 1980). Since AHP is easy to understand by decision makers, it has been widely used in the literature and has been performed in almost all applications for multi-attribute-decision making in the last 35 years (Dağdeviren et al, 2009). AHP enables both objective and subjective opinions to be included in the decision-making process (Rajaeian et al, 2017).…”

Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural System Selection Using the Integration of Multi-Attribute-Decision-Making (MADM) Methods

Polat

Turkoglu

Damcı

2018

Period. Polytech. Arch.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A structural system carries all loads acting on the building and transfers them effectively to the soil through the foundation. Since it is the essential component of a building, selecting the most appropriate structural system is one of the critical decisions in the structural design. The design team, which consists of engineers and architects, is responsible for determining the structural system that will satisfy the owner's and end user's needs as well as the legal requirements. Due to the fact that a number of compromising and conflicting criteria may affect the structural system selection process, it is a difficult task and it should be considered as a multi-attribute-decisionmaking (MADM) problem. The main objective of this study is to provide the design teams with a MADM approach that will assist them in selecting the most appropriate structural system in a more objective and systematic manner. In the proposed approach, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to compute the weights of the criteria and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) is employed to rank the structural system alternatives. In order to demonstrate how the proposed can be applied in a real life problem, the structural system of a housing project in Istanbul, Turkey is selected via this approach. The findings of the model were discussed with the decision making team in the studied project and they stated that the proposed approach could be easily employed as a guideline in selecting the most appropriate structural system from the managerial viewpoint. This paper is the revised version of the paper that has been published in the proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2018 (Polat et al., 2018).

show abstract

“…This technique has been adopted in many different applications, includingservice quality (Buyukozkan, <;ifC;i, 2012;Awasthi,et al 2011a), strategic management (Ding. 2005;Kahraman, 2004;Kabak, 2012;Fu, 2007;Dagdeviren, 2009;Paksoy,et al 2011;, risk assessment (Braglia,et al 2003;Wang. Elhag.…”

Section: Considered Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using A Integrated MCDM Model for Mining Method Selection in Presence of Uncertainty

Yazdani-Chamzini

Yakchali

Zavadskas

2012

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment

Cited by 654 publications

References 53 publications

Farkli Uzaklik Hesaplama Yaklaşimlarinin Topsis Üzeri̇nde Kullanilabi̇li̇rli̇ği̇ni̇n İncelenmesi̇

Farkli Uzaklik Hesaplama Yaklaşimlarinin Topsis Üzeri̇nde Kullanilabi̇li̇rli̇ği̇ni̇n İncelenmesi̇

Structural System Selection Using the Integration of Multi-Attribute-Decision-Making (MADM) Methods

Using A Integrated MCDM Model for Mining Method Selection in Presence of Uncertainty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About