2019 18th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2019.00282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Detecting and Counting Dead Cells in Microscopy Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, there is need for time and money in order to perform these assays. An interesting approach by Chen and collaborators using weakly supervised CNN models demonstrated that they could confidently detect and count dead cells in brightfield images of cell cultures [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, there is need for time and money in order to perform these assays. An interesting approach by Chen and collaborators using weakly supervised CNN models demonstrated that they could confidently detect and count dead cells in brightfield images of cell cultures [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, there is need for time and money in order to perform these assays. An interesting approach by Chen and collaborators using weakly supervised CNN models demonstrated that they could confidently detect and count dead cells in brightfield images of cell cultures (Chen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, computational methods have shown to be more precise, and more rigorous compared to visual/manual annotations 59 , in almost any objective task at hand, e.g. distinguishing living/dead cells 60 , annotating cells, identifying B cells in tissue sections 61 , etc. In this regard, Deep Learning (DL) methods stand out above the rest of the algorithmic approaches in almost any automatization task.…”
Section: Single-cell Analysis (Sca)mentioning
confidence: 99%