2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘We’re the First Port of Call’ – Perspectives of Ambulance Staff on Responding to Deaths by Suicide: A Qualitative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These feelings and doubts regarding the care of survivors are in line with the outcomes of Nilsson et al (2017) that studied the experiences of facing the family of a deceased by suicide in the prehospital emergency context. These findings are also in accordance with Nelson et al’s (2020) study, which concluded that having to deal with the intense emotional reactions of bereaved individuals is a difficulty for the paramedics. The loss of a patient by suicide and the coping processes of the prehospital emergency professionals of this study varied from professionals whose exposure to suicide did not appear to affect them (although it may be a process of denial as a defense mechanism) to professionals whose narratives included normal grief reactions, even though they did not last long.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These feelings and doubts regarding the care of survivors are in line with the outcomes of Nilsson et al (2017) that studied the experiences of facing the family of a deceased by suicide in the prehospital emergency context. These findings are also in accordance with Nelson et al’s (2020) study, which concluded that having to deal with the intense emotional reactions of bereaved individuals is a difficulty for the paramedics. The loss of a patient by suicide and the coping processes of the prehospital emergency professionals of this study varied from professionals whose exposure to suicide did not appear to affect them (although it may be a process of denial as a defense mechanism) to professionals whose narratives included normal grief reactions, even though they did not last long.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, different predictors of stress and traumatic impact defined in literature were described by those participants who had stress reactions in the aftermath of the death by suicide of an emergency patient, namely, a shocking death scenario ( Gutin et al, 2011 ), the lack of training and support ( Castelli Dransart et al, 2017 ), and a closeness with the patient ( Cerel et al, 2014 , 2017 ), even if it is a subjective closeness, through identification or countertransference mechanisms (e.g., “ It was a person of my age ”). Nelson et al (2020) also found this mechanism of identification as a potential risk factor for a greater distress. In agreement with findings of the influence of both the emotional closeness and the exposure to a higher number of suicides as potential factors that increase negative consequences ( Van Orden et al, 2010 ; Cerel et al, 2017 ), in this study the rescue to relapses seems to have had a greater disturbing effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations