2013 European Control Conference (ECC) 2013
DOI: 10.23919/ecc.2013.6669574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waypoint trajectory planning in the presence of obstacles with a tunnel-MILP approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our approach we utilize MILP optimization, which is also used in other MILP-based methods such as [3,19,46,53]. However, there are significant differences between those methods and our approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our approach we utilize MILP optimization, which is also used in other MILP-based methods such as [3,19,46,53]. However, there are significant differences between those methods and our approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can also find several approaches relying on formulation of a MILP (mixed-integer linear programming) problem for model-predictive control or planning, utilizing discrete time problem formulations with explicit discretization of controls such as [3,19,46,53]. Another interesting approach shown in [49] depends upon consideration of obstacle avoidance problem using optimal control framework.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are deterministic by construction and excel in low-dimensional problem spaces. Their convergence rate may be affected by topology of the environment, but not as much as in the case of sampling-based planners.Some planners using genetic algorithms [3], mathematical programming [12] or other not mentioned before forms of global optimization can be found. The vast majority of motion planners is designed to generate a plan in the form of control signals (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%