1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.78.4359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Packets in Perturbed Rydberg Systems

Abstract: We have excited wave packets in perturbed Rydberg states of barium, an atom with two optically active electrons, and have observed qualitatively different wave packets from those seen in one-electron atoms. In particular, we have found that electron-electron scattering quickly leads to excitation of a doubly excited state and subsequent passage of the population back and forth between different configurations or channels, the quantum analog of two coupled pendula. The experimental results can be successfully d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting situation appears for the series members between n = 24 and n = 28, the Rydberg transitions exhibit significant digression in the signal intensity around n = 27 (see figure 3) which in turn alters the transition probabilities. This region is strongly perturbed by the even parity 5d7d 1 D 2 doubly excited state and this decisive region in the vicinity of this perturber has been extensively studied by a number of groups (Gallagher et al 1981, Bhatti et al 1981, Matthias et al 1983, Leeuwen et al 1983, Mullins et al 1985, Schumacher et al 1997, Bates et al 2001, Smirnov 2003. However, the whole interest is focused on the precise measurements of energy positions, Stark effect calculations, configuration mixing and Rydberg-perturber character measurements but data on the transition probabilities or oscillator strengths for this region are almost lacking yet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting situation appears for the series members between n = 24 and n = 28, the Rydberg transitions exhibit significant digression in the signal intensity around n = 27 (see figure 3) which in turn alters the transition probabilities. This region is strongly perturbed by the even parity 5d7d 1 D 2 doubly excited state and this decisive region in the vicinity of this perturber has been extensively studied by a number of groups (Gallagher et al 1981, Bhatti et al 1981, Matthias et al 1983, Leeuwen et al 1983, Mullins et al 1985, Schumacher et al 1997, Bates et al 2001, Smirnov 2003. However, the whole interest is focused on the precise measurements of energy positions, Stark effect calculations, configuration mixing and Rydberg-perturber character measurements but data on the transition probabilities or oscillator strengths for this region are almost lacking yet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At longer times, the wave packet spreads and begins to exhibit non-classical behaviour. The ® rst experimental observation of a radial wave packet was only reported just over a decade ago (ten Wolde et al 1988), despite some earlier theoretical work (Alber et al 1986, Parker andStroud 1986a, b); however, there has since been a great deal of interest in the subject (for example Yeazell et al (1990Yeazell et al ( 1991, Meacher et al (1991), Broers et al (1993), Wals et al (1994), Jones (1996), Lankhuijzen and Noordam (1996), Schumacher et al (1997), Lyons et al (1998) and Ramswell et al (1999)) (see also the excellent reviews by Alber and Zoller (1991) and Jones and Noordam (1997) and references therein).…”
Section: Radial Wave-packet Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Conversely, experiments aimed at coherently manipulating and viewing the evolution of one-electron [37][38][39][40][41] and two-electron [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Rydberg wave packets typically utilize timedomain methods involving ultrafast optical and/or electricfield pulses to first excite coherent superposition states and then probe their behavior. For atoms with principal quantum number n <100 or so, the relevant dynamics in these experiments usually fall in the picosecond or femtosecond regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%