Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004012.pub4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults

Abstract: The data from five trials comparing differing washout policies were sparse and trials were generally of poor quality or poorly reported. The evidence was too scanty to conclude whether or not washouts were beneficial. In the first instance we require further rigorous, high quality trials with adequate power to detect any benefit from washout being performed as opposed to none. Then trials comparing different washout solutions, washout volumes, frequencies/timings and routes of administration are needed.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
30
3
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

Range
2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
26
3
2
2

Relationship

1
32

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 33 publications

(26 citation statements)
references

References 40 publications

0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Current evidence that these solutions are effective is poor, however they are still prescribed to frequent blockers. 19 From the samples received, three individuals (six samples) were prescribed washout/maintenance solutions. As these are only used for patients who are frequent blockers, these were added to the predictability test result (Fig.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%