2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wang–Landau sampling: Saving CPU time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our simulations, some easily implementable changes to the method are included, which lead to improved accuracy and to noticeable savings in CPU time. In particular, (i) the density of states is updated only after every Monte Carlo sweep, such that we discard very correlated configurations, (ii) the microcanonical averages are accumulated beginning from the eighth WL level (f 7 ), so that we avoid considering the initial configurations that do not match with those of maximum entropy [21], (iii) a checking parameter ε is used for halting the simulation [22] (the integral of the specific heat over a range of temperatures is calculated using the current density of states during the simulations and the simulations are halted if this quantity varies less then 10 −4 during a whole WL level), and (iv) a single run is performed for all lattice sizes up to the Wang-Landau level f 6 and then, the further simulations begin from these outputs, since up to this point the current density of states is not biased yet and the results we reach are similar to those that would be obtained beginning from the first WL level f 0 [23], a measure that saves about 60% in computational time.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…In our simulations, some easily implementable changes to the method are included, which lead to improved accuracy and to noticeable savings in CPU time. In particular, (i) the density of states is updated only after every Monte Carlo sweep, such that we discard very correlated configurations, (ii) the microcanonical averages are accumulated beginning from the eighth WL level (f 7 ), so that we avoid considering the initial configurations that do not match with those of maximum entropy [21], (iii) a checking parameter ε is used for halting the simulation [22] (the integral of the specific heat over a range of temperatures is calculated using the current density of states during the simulations and the simulations are halted if this quantity varies less then 10 −4 during a whole WL level), and (iv) a single run is performed for all lattice sizes up to the Wang-Landau level f 6 and then, the further simulations begin from these outputs, since up to this point the current density of states is not biased yet and the results we reach are similar to those that would be obtained beginning from the first WL level f 0 [23], a measure that saves about 60% in computational time.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…IV. SIMULATIONAL DETAILS Entropic sampling simulations are based on the Wang-Landau method [23] where we introduced some changes to improve accuracy and help saving CPU time [24][25][26]. We halt the simulations when the sixteenth Wang-Landau level (f 15 ) becomes flat.…”
Section: Partition Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entropic simulations [11][12][13][14] are excellent to study phase transitions and critical phenomena. The results obtained by this technique have revealed important characteristics regarding different models [10,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%