2019
DOI: 10.1177/2516019219866569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WAM and WAVEWATCH-III intercomparison studies in the North Indian Ocean using Oceansat-2 Scatterometer winds

Abstract: This paper presents the intercomparison of wave hindcasts using the third-generation models WAM and WAVEWATCH-III for the North Indian Ocean over 1° × 1° (latitude × longitude) grid resolutions, which reveals the first assessment of their relative performance through intercomparison of the model results. Hindcast wave parameters such as significant wave height, mean wave period, and swell wave height obtained from the simulations using Oceansat-2 scatterometer winds are analyzed to understand the quality and v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where r t is the real observation of the significant wave height at time t and nt is computed according to (14) and obtained as follows: , we train the N-LSTM by maximizing the log-likelihood as follows:…”
Section: N-lstm Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where r t is the real observation of the significant wave height at time t and nt is computed according to (14) and obtained as follows: , we train the N-LSTM by maximizing the log-likelihood as follows:…”
Section: N-lstm Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WAM model and WMIII model are similar in structure. WMIII uses more complicated dissipation source terms and wind input terms than the WAM model [14]. Liu et al [15] use the data of the South Indian Ocean to compare the performance of WAM and WMIII.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the importance of accurately predicting SWH, researchers have conducted extensive research on SWH prediction methods. Traditional methods mainly include statistical methods and numerical simulation methods and have been widely used in global sea state prediction (Group, 1988;Vanem, 2016;Kazeminezhad and Siadatmousavi, 2017;Umesh and Swain, 2018;Liang et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2019;Swain et al, 2019;Emmanouil et al, 2020;Gao et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020;Gao et al, 2021a). Both statistical methods and numerical simulation methods attempt to predict SWH through approximate mathematical relational models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the prediction of SWH has always been a matter of special concern. Under normal circumstances, the prediction can be completed by numerical models such as WAM [6][7][8], WAVEWATCH [9][10][11], SWAN [12][13][14]. However, because the strong nonlinear physical process and mechanism of ocean waves are still unclear, the numerical model is still unable to obtain high accuracy to a large extent [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%