2014
DOI: 10.1139/cjp-2013-0692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall proximity effects on flow over cylinders with different cross sections

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a numerical study on flow characteristics over circular, square, and diamond cross-sectional cylinders. Investigations are performed in a two-dimensional domain using the finite volume discretization method solver for Reynolds number, Re = 20 000. Unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations with Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model have been used as a turbulence closure. After the validation of the simulations with the available experimental data from the open literature,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of these turbulence models is presented in Table 2 by comparing the change in drag coefficient with the data of Talay, 1975. It is seen that both SKO and SKE are unfavorable while the C D obtained with their derivatives such as SSTKO and RKE are closer to the data of Talay, 1975. In comparison with the results obtained by S-A these two-equation turbulence models may also be eliminated since there is only 4.2% difference between the reported C D of Talay, 1975 and the one found by S-A. These results are not surprising since such problems are commonly analyzed by S-A turbulence model due to its less simulation time and robustness in problems related to the aerodynamics, (Bayraktar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The performance of these turbulence models is presented in Table 2 by comparing the change in drag coefficient with the data of Talay, 1975. It is seen that both SKO and SKE are unfavorable while the C D obtained with their derivatives such as SSTKO and RKE are closer to the data of Talay, 1975. In comparison with the results obtained by S-A these two-equation turbulence models may also be eliminated since there is only 4.2% difference between the reported C D of Talay, 1975 and the one found by S-A. These results are not surprising since such problems are commonly analyzed by S-A turbulence model due to its less simulation time and robustness in problems related to the aerodynamics, (Bayraktar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It is seen that the Case 4 is the best configuration among the models because it contains few areas of blue-shaded colors which mean minimum flow separation. In the present study, the gap between the ground and the bottom surface of the pickup truck is kept constant and flow structure due to this gap is not investigated, however, the reader may get knowledge in detail about the flow over and beneath a solid body from this one [20]. Flow fields obtained at y/h=0.5 is shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the diffuser angle reduces the drag coefficient until =15 and after that drag coefficient increases gradually and reaches its maximum. It is demonstrated by several researchers that a symmetrical body in a free stream has zero lift coefficient when the side walls of the computational domain are far away from the cylinder [23], however, as the cylinder is moved toward one of the side walls the flow along the underside of the cylinder is constrained and causing flow acceleration and resulting decrease in static pressure. Therefore, it is not surprise to see a suction on the underbody.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%