2013
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2013.845248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WAIS-IV Reliable Digit Span is no More Accurate Than Age Corrected Scaled Score as an Indicator of Invalid Performance in a Veteran Sample Undergoing Evaluation for mTBI

Abstract: Reliable Digit Span (RDS) is a measure of effort derived from the Digit Span subtest of the Wechsler intelligence scales. Some authors have suggested that the age-corrected scaled score provides a more accurate measure of effort than RDS. This study examined the relative diagnostic accuracy of the traditional RDS, an extended RDS including the new Sequencing task from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, and the age-corrected scaled score, relative to performance validity as determined by the Test of Memo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digit span test [25] has two components: forward and backward. In the digit span forward test, the examiner reads out a list of digits at the rate of 1 digit/s and the subject is required to repeat the sequence in the same order.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digit span test [25] has two components: forward and backward. In the digit span forward test, the examiner reads out a list of digits at the rate of 1 digit/s and the subject is required to repeat the sequence in the same order.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above this, all EI-5 scores were considered a Fail, with each additional value providing incremental evidence for the accuracy of the classification. To maximize the purity of the reference groups used to calibrate the target PVT, Borderline cases were excluded from (Heinly et al, 2005;Spencer et al, 2013); LM Logical Memory (Bortnik et al, 2010;Pearson, 2009), CVLT-II recognition hits (RH CVLT-II ; Wolfe et al, 2010), and Forced Choice Recognition (FCR CVLT-II ; Moore & Donders, 2004;Bauer et al, 2005) cross-validation analyses, following recommendations by Greve and Bianchini (2004). Finally, the logistical regression equations developed by Suhr and Boyer (1999) and King et al (2002) were used as alternative reference PVTs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DS ACSS has also been applied as a PVT, with scaled scores ≤5 suggesting invalid performance (Webber & Soble, 2018). Evidence suggests that DS ACSS may be as effective as RDS and potentially superior among older (e.g., 39-69) clinical groups and those at higher risk of neurocognitive impairment (Jasinski et al, 2011;Reese, Suhr, & Riddle, 2012;Spencer et al, 2013Spencer et al, , 2017Webber & Soble, 2018). In a sample of veterans referred to a neuropsychological clinic, DS ACSS significantly predicted group membership (e.g., valid vs. invalid performance) with an AUC of .85 (Webber & Soble, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%