2004
DOI: 10.1186/cc2892
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Introduction Consistent data about the incidence and outcome of sepsis in Latin American intensive care units (ICUs), including Brazil, are lacking. This study was designed to verify the actual incidence density and outcome of sepsis in Brazilian ICUs. We also assessed the association between the Consensus Conference criteria and outcome Methods This is a multicenter observational cohort study performed in five private and public, mixed ICUs from two different regions of Brazil. We prospectively followed 1383 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
3
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
5
109
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 present the characteristics of identified studies of the incidence, prevalence and mortality rate of sepsis at the population level. All the studies reported their own original results based on hospital findings with a clearly defined credible population denominator which in some cases has been used to produce the national estimates that the studies reported [9,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the concept of sepsis is continuously debated in consensus meetings (Bone et al 1992, Levy et al 2003. A multicenter observational cohort study reported that the incidence of sepsis is about 57 per 1,000 patient-days (Silva et al 2004) and another study showed that around 17% of intensive care unit (ICU) beds are occupied by these patients (Sales-Júnior et al 2006). This illness is probably the leading cause of mortality in general and surgical ICU.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developed countries, population sepsis incidence ranged from 22 to 240/100,000, of severe sepsis from 13 to 300/100,000 and of septic shock 11/100,000 [14]- [19], with a case fatality rate up to 30% for sepsis, 50% for severe sepsis and 80% for septic shock, depending on the setting and severity of the disease [14]- [19]. In developing countries, national population incidences are unknown, but various hospital based studies among neonates from different countries show a prevalence ranging from 6 -9/1000 live births in Ethiopia to 20.3 -29.3/1000 live births in India [7] [20] [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, a morbidade e a presença de alterações funcionais que podem ser desencadeadas pela sepse demonstram a importância da elucidação dos processos patológicos envolvidos nessa síndrome. Um estudo epidemiológico realizado em unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI) do Brasil mostrou que em uma população de 3.128 pacientes, 16,7% foram acometidos pela Sepse e desses 46,6% foram a óbito (Silva et al, 2004). Outro estudo desenvolvido nos estados de São Paulo e Santa Catarina mostrou uma incidência de sepse de 46,9%, com mortalidade de 33,9% desses pacientes.…”
Section: Sepse: Definição Aspectos Patofisiológicos E Epidemiológicosunclassified
“…Based on the Malaysian Registry of Intensive Care report for year 2011, 23.2% of Malaysian ICU patients developed severe sepsis within 24 hours of ICU admission with a mortality rate approaching 60% [36]. Despite an emerging trend for improved survival in ICU patients [32,[37][38][39], the mortality rate in critically ill patients remains unacceptably high worldwide, ranging from 30-50% in severe sepsis and 40-87% in patients with septic shock [37,[40][41][42][43][44][45]. As a consequence, huge hospital resources are spent worldwide on septic patients [46,47].…”
Section: Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%