2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022910310082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, factors such as root activity and density per area, the presence of mycorrhizal fungi, availability of C substrates for microbial biomass, nitrogen content, organic matter content, and other soil physical and chemical properties also influence soil CO 2 emissions (Lohila et al 2003;Xu et al 2006;Dube et al 2009). In accordance with Villanueva-López et al (2014), in this zone, soil pH and bulk density were higher in the systems with live fences (LF) than in the livestock systems in grass monoculture (GM) ( Table 1), indicating that the presence of G. sepium trees in the systems with live fences (LF) may have improved bulk density and soil pH, probably through an increase in leaf litter entering the system as reported by Berninger and Salas (2003), Eldridge and Wong (2005), and Villanueva-López et al (2014). However, our results show that there were no significant differences in soil CO 2 emissions between systems, and they show the same trend as the content of organic matter (Table 1), suggesting that improved physical and chemical soil properties do not necessarily result in higher soil CO 2 emissions, while the lower contents of organic matter (Table 1) in the livestock systems in grass monoculture (GM), due to the absence of trees, may have resulted in emissions being more sensitive to diurnal changes.…”
Section: Experiments and Methods Of Sampling Soil Co 2 Emissions And Esupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, factors such as root activity and density per area, the presence of mycorrhizal fungi, availability of C substrates for microbial biomass, nitrogen content, organic matter content, and other soil physical and chemical properties also influence soil CO 2 emissions (Lohila et al 2003;Xu et al 2006;Dube et al 2009). In accordance with Villanueva-López et al (2014), in this zone, soil pH and bulk density were higher in the systems with live fences (LF) than in the livestock systems in grass monoculture (GM) ( Table 1), indicating that the presence of G. sepium trees in the systems with live fences (LF) may have improved bulk density and soil pH, probably through an increase in leaf litter entering the system as reported by Berninger and Salas (2003), Eldridge and Wong (2005), and Villanueva-López et al (2014). However, our results show that there were no significant differences in soil CO 2 emissions between systems, and they show the same trend as the content of organic matter (Table 1), suggesting that improved physical and chemical soil properties do not necessarily result in higher soil CO 2 emissions, while the lower contents of organic matter (Table 1) in the livestock systems in grass monoculture (GM), due to the absence of trees, may have resulted in emissions being more sensitive to diurnal changes.…”
Section: Experiments and Methods Of Sampling Soil Co 2 Emissions And Esupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It attains a height up to 30 m. Pruning is a common silvicultural practice to increase wood production, improve tree shape and potentially uses to obtain poles and fire wood without decrease in wood productivity. Pruning of tree component is a powerful approach to regulate light, nutrient, and other resource competition (Frank andEduao, 2003, Dhillon et al, 2010) [5] . Many scientists reported that pruning improves wood quality and tree stem shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%