2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11723-8_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voxel-Wise Comparison with a-contrario Analysis for Automated Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions from Multimodal MRI

Abstract: We introduce a new framework for the automated and unsupervised segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis lesions from multimodal Magnetic Resonance images. It relies on a voxel-wise approach to detect local white matter abnormalities, with an a-contrario analysis, which takes into account local information. First, a voxel-wise comparison of multimodal patient images to a set of controls is performed. Then, regionbased probabilities are estimated using an a-contrario approach. Finally, correction for multiple testing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate identification of MS lesions in MRI images is extremely difficult due to variability in lesion location, size, and shape, in addition to anatomical variability across patients. Since manual segmentation requires expert knowledge, it is time consuming and prone to intra-and inter-expert variability, several methods have been proposed to automatically segment MS lesions (García-Lorenzo et al, 2013;Commowick et al, 2018;Galassi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate identification of MS lesions in MRI images is extremely difficult due to variability in lesion location, size, and shape, in addition to anatomical variability across patients. Since manual segmentation requires expert knowledge, it is time consuming and prone to intra-and inter-expert variability, several methods have been proposed to automatically segment MS lesions (García-Lorenzo et al, 2013;Commowick et al, 2018;Galassi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%