2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0223-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex-Assisted Ionic Liquid Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Triazole Fungicides in Fruit Juices

Abstract: A rapid, efficient, and environmentally friendly method using vortex-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquidliquid microextraction (VA-IL-DLLME) prior to highperformance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array detection (HPLC-PDA) has been developed for the determination of six triazole fungicides (triazolone, triadimenol, epoxiconazole, flusilazole, tebuconazole, and diniconazole) in various fruit juices. 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C 6 MIM][PF 6 ]) and acetonitrile were used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the comparison that the method developed presented LOD in the same range for the studies with LC–MS/MS detection but better LODs when using determinations by HPLC–UV, HPLC–DAD, or GC–MS . Extraction efficiencies and RSDs were in the same range of current published techniques .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from the comparison that the method developed presented LOD in the same range for the studies with LC–MS/MS detection but better LODs when using determinations by HPLC–UV, HPLC–DAD, or GC–MS . Extraction efficiencies and RSDs were in the same range of current published techniques .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Other techniques that have been recently developed for the extraction of pesticides from liquid samples were compared in terms of LOD, recovery, RSD, salt addition, extraction time, and extraction solvent volume (Table 3). It can be seen from the comparison that the method developed presented LOD in the same range for the studies with LC-MS/MS detection but better LODs when using determinations by HPLC-UV, HPLC-DAD, or GC-MS [34][35][36]. Extraction efficiencies and RSDs were in the same range of current published techniques [37,38].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Methods With Other Microextractionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Recently, several analytical methods have emerged as the promising techniques to detect nitrogen‐containing heterocyclic fungicides, including HPLC , LC–MS/MS , GC , and GC–MS . However, these detection methods suffer greatly from matrix interferences within the complex sample matrix, often resulting in false positives .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the use of acetone and methanol as dispersion solvents increases the burden on the environment. To avoid the use of dispersion solvents, assisted‐dispersion methods were proposed, e.g ., vortex‐assisted liquid–liquid microextraction (VA‐LLME), a milder emulsification procedure in which the fine droplets of extraction solvent are formed by vortex agitation, therefore, a cloudy state is formed in the absence of a disperser solvent. The vortex‐assisted method increased the contact areas between extraction solvent and sample, avoiding the use of dispersion solvents and reducing the impact on the environment …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%