2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice acoustical measurement of the severity of major depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
112
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
112
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For research investigating differences in speech rate for pathological populations, this script may also be useful. For instance, Cannizzaro et al (2004) investigated the relation between ratings of major depression and speech rate (measured by hand) and found strong correlations. Depressed and schizophrenic patients may speak monotonously (see, e.g., Covington et al, 2005, for an overview).…”
Section: Speech Data For the Ifa Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research investigating differences in speech rate for pathological populations, this script may also be useful. For instance, Cannizzaro et al (2004) investigated the relation between ratings of major depression and speech rate (measured by hand) and found strong correlations. Depressed and schizophrenic patients may speak monotonously (see, e.g., Covington et al, 2005, for an overview).…”
Section: Speech Data For the Ifa Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannizzaro et al (2004) examined the relationship between depression and speech by performing statistical analyses of different acoustic measures, including speaking rate, percent pause time, and pitch variation. Their results demonstrated that speaking rate and pitch variation had a strong correlation with the depression rating scale.…”
Section: Speech Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such speech recording tasks take place under ideal voice recording conditions (Cannizzaro, Harel, Reilly, Chappell, & Snyder, 2004), while speech analysis is more difficult when conducted outside a controlled setting, because of so-called noisy channel effects (Janssen, Tacke, de Vries, van den Broek, Westerink, Haselager, & IJsselsteijn, 2013). Moreover, controlled speech tasks are cognitively less demanding than free speech tasks (Alpert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Computational Linguistics Speech Analysis and Mental Healtmentioning
confidence: 99%