2014
DOI: 10.3109/09273948.2014.939530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These diseases can be excluded on the basis of clinical manifestations, disease course, systemic medical workup, and ophthalmic imaging findings. [9,10,12,13] There was a significant improvement in BCVA and OCT findings in this case following the administration of high-dose intravenous corticosteroid. During the rapid tapering of the corticosteroid due to systemic complications, fellow eye involvement appeared clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These diseases can be excluded on the basis of clinical manifestations, disease course, systemic medical workup, and ophthalmic imaging findings. [9,10,12,13] There was a significant improvement in BCVA and OCT findings in this case following the administration of high-dose intravenous corticosteroid. During the rapid tapering of the corticosteroid due to systemic complications, fellow eye involvement appeared clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although according to the current revised diagnostic criteria, bilateral ocular involvement is necessary for the diagnosis of VKH, there are a few reports of unilateral or asymmetrical ocular involvement. [9,10,12,13] Our patient had clinical and paraclinical features compatible with VKH except for unilaterality at initial presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A multimodal imaging approach utilizing FA, ICGA, and spectral domain-OCT is important in the differential diagnosis and follow-up of the disease. 12 CSCR is most commonly mistaken for the exudative retinal detachment seen in the acute phase of VKH. Findings that facilitate the diagnosis of CSCR are an absence of cells in the anterior chamber or vitreous and no sign of optic disc edema on examination; no choroidal thickening in USG; an absence of optic disc staining in late phases of FA; and observing multifocal hyperpermeability instead of diffuse hyperpermeability and the absence of hypofluorescence spots or optic disc staining on ICGA.9 Other findings that support CSCR diagnosis are the presence of dome-shaped serous detachment on OCT, subretinal precipitates, localized fibrin reaction, presence of RPE detachment and irregularities, no visible subretinal septa, fundus autofluorescence showing hypoautofluorescence in the area of subretinal fluid, and hyperautofluorescence corresponding with areas of leakage on FA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current diagnostic criteria for VKH disease require the presence of bilateral ocular involvement; however, unilateral or delayed involvement of the fellow eye can occur in rare cases [ 8 ]. The diagnosis of VKH disease is essentially clinical and angiographic: exudative retinal detachment during the acute disease is very specific and FA typically reveals numerous punctate hyperfluorescent areas at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium in the early stage of the exam followed by pooling of dye in the subretinal space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%