2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46604-0_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Link Retrieval in a Database of Paintings

Abstract: Abstract. This paper examines how far state-of-the-art machine vision algorithms can be used to retrieve common visual patterns shared by series of paintings. The research of such visual patterns, central to Art History Research, is challenging because of the diversity of similarity criteria that could relevantly demonstrate genealogical links. We design a methodology and a tool to annotate efficiently clusters of similar paintings and test various algorithms in a retrieval task. We show that pretrained convol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsurprisingly, the pre-trained models obtained the worst results among all the baselines, as they do not present enough discriminative power in the domain of art. Also, there was a clear improvement with respect to pre-trained baselines when the networks were fine-tuned, as already noted in previous work [30,39,44,45]. On the other hand, adding attributes or captions to the visual representations seemed to improve the accuracy, although not in all the scenarios, e.g., Timeframe was better classified with the fine-tuned ResNet50 model than with ResNet50+Attributes or ResNet50+Captions, whereas School was better classified with the fine-tuned ResNet50 than with ResNet50+Captions.…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unsurprisingly, the pre-trained models obtained the worst results among all the baselines, as they do not present enough discriminative power in the domain of art. Also, there was a clear improvement with respect to pre-trained baselines when the networks were fine-tuned, as already noted in previous work [30,39,44,45]. On the other hand, adding attributes or captions to the visual representations seemed to improve the accuracy, although not in all the scenarios, e.g., Timeframe was better classified with the fine-tuned ResNet50 model than with ResNet50+Attributes or ResNet50+Captions, whereas School was better classified with the fine-tuned ResNet50 than with ResNet50+Captions.…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…in which computer vision techniques are applied to study the content [12,39], the style [9,38], or to classify the attributes [30,32] of a specific piece of art.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal, however, is to go further and focus on the computational analysis of relationships between individual artworks. Seguin et al [40,39] propose to find visual relationships in collections of paintings. However, while they use off-the-shelf CNNs trained in a supervised manner, we focus on the design of a new self-supervised feature learning specifically trained for the task.…”
Section: Computer Vision and Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern image retrieval methods, both local feature and CNN based, have been applied to search in datasets of artworks [3], [4]. This approach can be further improved with human-in-the-loop, as demonstrated by [5] where the annotations are iteratively refined and the CNN model is retrained.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%