2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual asymmetry revisited: Mind wandering preferentially disrupts processing in the left visual field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(86 reference statements)
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is different from previously published studies as we used brainwaves (MEG and EEG) as the main parameter to study hemispheric activity and hemispheric specialization (dominance) for various tasks. Our brainwave study supports the findings of previous studies on hemispheric specialization using various other modali ties [9,10,[40][41][42][43][44][45]. Our chapter highlights that for sensorimotor activity, marked brainwave responses were noted in both hemispheres with a preference (lateralization or dominance or specialization) for one hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussion: Bilateral Hemispheric Responses and Hemispheric supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our study is different from previously published studies as we used brainwaves (MEG and EEG) as the main parameter to study hemispheric activity and hemispheric specialization (dominance) for various tasks. Our brainwave study supports the findings of previous studies on hemispheric specialization using various other modali ties [9,10,[40][41][42][43][44][45]. Our chapter highlights that for sensorimotor activity, marked brainwave responses were noted in both hemispheres with a preference (lateralization or dominance or specialization) for one hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussion: Bilateral Hemispheric Responses and Hemispheric supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since the publication of this review, Mrazek, Phillips, et al (2013) have similarly reported impaired reading comprehension associated with prompt-assessed mind-wandering. A number of further studies have found additional costs: attentional lapses associated with impaired performance on the Stroop task (Unsworth & McMillan, 2014), a significant relationship between mind-wandering proclivity and frequency of falls in older adults, presumably at least partly because of inattention to external stimuli (Nagamatsu et al, 2013), particularly in the left visual field (Kam, Nagamatsu, & Handy, 2014), and reduced empathic responses to others' physical discomfort, as assessed by participants' ratings and electrophysiologically with event-related potentials (Kam, Xu, & Handy, 2014). By contrast, when leaving aside its perseverative, ruminative forms, mindwandering appears unrelated to most measures of health Ottaviani, Shapiro, & Couyoumdjian, 2013).…”
Section: Costs Of Spontaneous Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the gaze fixity appeared as a sensitive indicator of MW. Indeed, MW draws on working memory resources (Kam et al, 2014) to trigger and feed self-generated thoughts (Levinson et al, 2012). MW and PSTs seem to have different oculometric signatures strengthening the need to distinguish the kind of thought when studying off-task thoughts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, when they became aware of their inattentive state, corresponding to a gain in meta-consciousness (Schooler, 2002) participants declared their thought and were instructed to focus back on the driving task. However, MW impairs the working memory update (Kam, Nagamatsu, & Handy, 2014) by drawing attentional resources from it to feed thoughts (Levinson, Smallwood, & Davidson, 2012). This means that drivers could no longer be able to refresh their situational awareness, which corresponds to the state of knowledge about the elements in a dynamic environment (Endsley, 1995).…”
Section: Cardiac Datamentioning
confidence: 99%