1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-13015-5_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visionary Speech: Looking Ahead to Practical Speechreading Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the stage at which the audio and visual streams are fused, one can generally classify these approaches into three main categories, namely early, intermediate, and late integration techniques [46], ranging from methods that enforce strict stream alignment to methods that process each stream independently. Intermediate integration techniques, which allow moderate asynchrony between the modalities, are perhaps best suited for modeling audiovisual speech.…”
Section: Synchronous and Asynchronous Integration Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the stage at which the audio and visual streams are fused, one can generally classify these approaches into three main categories, namely early, intermediate, and late integration techniques [46], ranging from methods that enforce strict stream alignment to methods that process each stream independently. Intermediate integration techniques, which allow moderate asynchrony between the modalities, are perhaps best suited for modeling audiovisual speech.…”
Section: Synchronous and Asynchronous Integration Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in audio-visual speech recognition, the issue of early versus late combination is well known (e.g., Hennecke, Stork, and Venkatesh Prasad 1996). Early combination fuses different sources of information into a single, large feature vector which forms the input to a single recognition system.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On theoretical grounds and on the necessity of maintaining temporal relationships and low-level dependencies, many argue for feature fusion [26]. On the other hand, comparative empirical studies have demonstrated that decision fusion techniques are performing better than feature fusion methods, having more practical benefits [27].…”
Section: Fusion Of Audio and Visual Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%