2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus-like nanoparticle as a co-delivery system to enhance efficacy of CRISPR/Cas9-based cancer immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 16 ] PD‐L1 is identified as a prominent negative immunoregulatory molecule that can protect tumor cells from T‐cell‐mediated immune surveillance by inhibiting the proliferation and effector functions of T lymphocytes after specific binding to its receptor, PD‐1 on T cells. [ 17 ] As a powerful genome‐editing tool, CRISPR/Cas9 has shown its great potential to precisely and effectively disrupt PD‐L1 pathway in recent studies, [ 13,18 ] which could potentially bring a new modality for anti‐PD‐L1 therapy in cancer treatment. To this end, the specific sgRNA against PD‐L1 was designed and further optimized to achieve efficient genome editing of PD‐L1 genomic locus (Figure S13, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16 ] PD‐L1 is identified as a prominent negative immunoregulatory molecule that can protect tumor cells from T‐cell‐mediated immune surveillance by inhibiting the proliferation and effector functions of T lymphocytes after specific binding to its receptor, PD‐1 on T cells. [ 17 ] As a powerful genome‐editing tool, CRISPR/Cas9 has shown its great potential to precisely and effectively disrupt PD‐L1 pathway in recent studies, [ 13,18 ] which could potentially bring a new modality for anti‐PD‐L1 therapy in cancer treatment. To this end, the specific sgRNA against PD‐L1 was designed and further optimized to achieve efficient genome editing of PD‐L1 genomic locus (Figure S13, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies demonstrated the high efficiency of NC-mediated gene editing upon local injection in the retina or muscles (Chen et al, 2019). Liu et al (2020) used bioreducible lipid NPs (LNPs) to deliver Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs. This represents one of the most efficacious tools for non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing with an in vitro target efficiency of up to ∼90% in green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells, and an in vivo editing efficiency of ∼80% for the Pck1 gene, a therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Non-viral Methods For Gene Editing Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When utilized for CRISPR delivery in preclinical studies, these nanoparticles are commonly mesoporous and formulated with tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as well as conjugated with some form of lipid or organic compound. Multiple preclinical applications demonstrated the potential of silica nanoparticles for in vivo delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 to treat murine models of hypercholesterolemia 120 , hepatocellular carcinoma 121 , pulmonary adenocarcinoma 122 , and melanoma 123 as well as proof-of-concept editing in retinal pigment epithelium 124 and brain neurons 125 .…”
Section: Current Vectors For In Vivo Delivery Of Crispr-cas9 Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%