Virtual Care Initiatives for Older Adults in Australia: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background There has been a rapid shift toward the adoption of virtual health care services in Australia. It is unknown how widely virtual care has been implemented or evaluated for the care of older adults in Australia. Objective We aimed to review the literature evaluating virtual care initiatives for older adults across a wide range of health conditions and modalities and identify key challenges and opportunities for wider adoption at both patient and system levels in Australia. Methods A scoping review of the literature was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, and gray literature (January 1, 2011, to March 8, 2021) to identify virtual care initiatives for older Australians (aged ≥65 years). The results were reported according to the World Health Organization’s digital health evaluation framework. Results Among the 6296 documents in the search results, we identified 94 that reported 80 unique virtual care initiatives. Most (69/80, 89%) were at the pilot stage and targeted community-dwelling older adults (64/79, 81%) with chronic diseases (52/80, 65%). The modes of delivery included videoconference, telephone, apps, device or monitoring systems, and web-based technologies. Most initiatives showed either similar or better health and behavioral outcomes compared with in-person care. The key barriers for wider adoption were physical, cognitive, or sensory impairment in older adults and staffing issues, legislative issues, and a lack of motivation among providers. Conclusions Virtual care is a viable model of care to address a wide range of health conditions among older adults in Australia. More embedded and integrative evaluations are needed to ensure that virtually enabled care can be used more widely by older Australians and health care providers.

“Technology has allowed us to do a lot more but it’s not necessarily the panacea for everybody”: Family physician perspectives on virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

“…The physicians we interviewed expressed concerns that their elderly patients, many of whom had limited technological literacy, struggled with virtual care. This aligns with existing research demonstrating that older adults are less likely to engage in virtual video visits compared with younger adults [56], although evidence indicates similar or better health outcomes from virtual care amongst older adults compared to in-person appointments [57]. They also noted that, while virtual care was particularly useful for patients who lived in rural communities who had to travel long PLOS ONE distances to seek care, these patients also had less ability to benefit from virtual access due to poorer internet and telephone services where they lived [58,59].…”

Current Geriatric Emergency Medicine Education and Training in Australasia: How this relates to the global context and opportunities for the future

“…It is important to consider the growing number of ED substitutive care models arising and how specific training on these is included. The growing telehealth sector also requires specific consideration as to how virtual care and telehealth education should be included, and how telehealth should be used with caution/modified in older people, particularly those living with frailty and/or cognitive impairment 11 . Research in frailty assessment in the pre‐hospital and ED setting is growing and frailty consideration as part of comprehensive care is important, but there remains scope to better define how frailty assessment should be used specifically in ED, as well as the role of emergency physicians as part of the CGA process 12 …”