2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2139-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VIPER: Visualization Pipeline for RNA-seq, a Snakemake workflow for efficient and complete RNA-seq analysis

Abstract: BackgroundRNA sequencing has become a ubiquitous technology used throughout life sciences as an effective method of measuring RNA abundance quantitatively in tissues and cells. The increase in use of RNA-seq technology has led to the continuous development of new tools for every step of analysis from alignment to downstream pathway analysis. However, effectively using these analysis tools in a scalable and reproducible way can be challenging, especially for non-experts.ResultsUsing the workflow management syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
134
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21,22] RNAseq analysis was performed using the VIPER snakemake pipeline. [23] The EnrichR platform was used to assess gene expression ontology. [24,25] Functional enrichment with WikiPathways 2019 Mouse and ChEA2016 Transcription pathway analysis are reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,22] RNAseq analysis was performed using the VIPER snakemake pipeline. [23] The EnrichR platform was used to assess gene expression ontology. [24,25] Functional enrichment with WikiPathways 2019 Mouse and ChEA2016 Transcription pathway analysis are reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galaxy [47], Taverna [48], Snakemake [49], Nextflow [50], CIPHER [51], and bcbio-nextgen [52] all provide NGS data analysis infrastructure in various computer language environments. For example, tools such as VIPER [2], TRAPLINE [53], HppRNA [54], and QuickRNASeq [55] are RNA-Seq pipelines based on the Snakemake framework, combining tools in numerous languages including R, Python, Perl, C++, or Java. Although there are many frameworks for RNA-Seq data analysis, only a few of them are able to run end-to-end RNA-Seq data analysis in a pure R environment.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see from the table, some workflows do not include all the steps, either missing the QC steps [27,28], or the last steps, quantification and DEA [29]. Some of the workflows are limited to specific organisms typically human or mouse and in some cases other model organisms [30,27,31,32]. Some of them have functionality only for mapping reads to a reference genome and do not support the use of a transcriptome reference [27,31,32,33].…”
Section: Comparison To Other Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the workflows are limited to specific organisms typically human or mouse and in some cases other model organisms [30,27,31,32]. Some of them have functionality only for mapping reads to a reference genome and do not support the use of a transcriptome reference [27,31,32,33]. Most of the workflows have high demands: some of them require a high-performance computer with large internal memory [31,29,32,33]; some of them need complex installation processes depending on the user to install other tools or libraries separately, which easily leads to version conflicts [28,33]; some workflows require users to be able to program which makes them unusable for some biologists [28,33].…”
Section: Comparison To Other Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%