2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jms.2014.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration–rotation transition dipoles from first principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the strength of vibrational excitations depends on the variation of the dipole moment as function of geometry [20], the static dipole moment of the considered states is calculated and plotted as function of the internuclear distance R such that these curves can help to obtain accurate predictions of transition intensities. With the zinc atom at the origin, the sign convention is defined such as the negative value corresponds to the Zn d+ Br dÀ polarity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the strength of vibrational excitations depends on the variation of the dipole moment as function of geometry [20], the static dipole moment of the considered states is calculated and plotted as function of the internuclear distance R such that these curves can help to obtain accurate predictions of transition intensities. With the zinc atom at the origin, the sign convention is defined such as the negative value corresponds to the Zn d+ Br dÀ polarity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the ab initio dipole moment calculations of Lodi et al (2011) cover an appropriate range of geometries and are expected to be accurate, using them to construct a reliable DMS is not straightforward. A number of studies (Schwenke and Partridge, 2000;Lodi et al, 2008;Tennyson, 2014) have shown that it is difficult to produce analytic fits, which correctly reproduce the intensity of weak transitions. Here we are dealing with very weak water absorptions on the margins of detectability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the water molecule it was found [16,39] that corecorrelation and relativistic corrections, which both have an absolute magnitude of about 0.0008 D, cancel each other out almost entirely, so that their sum only contributes by about 0.0001 D. The situation for H 2 S is different as in this case both relativity and core-correlation tend to reduce the magnitude of dipoles, so that mutual cancellation between the two contributions does not generally happen. An exception to this behavior occurs for energies up to 5000 cm À 1 for the small component of the dipole moment (perpendicular to the bond-angle bisector); in this particular case the two corrections have similar magnitude (about 0.001 D) and opposite signs, so that they do largely cancel.…”
Section: Core Correlation and Relativistic Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%