1990
Vestibular papillae of the vulva. Lack of evidence for human papillomavirus etiology
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
24
15
1
0
Citation Types
2
45
0
2
Year Published
1993
2024
Publication Types
Select...
33
3
1
Relationship
0
37
Authors
Journals
Cited by 37 publications
(49 citation statements)
References 0 publications
2
45
0
2
“…We consider papillomatosis of the vulvar vestibule as a normal variant in the vulvar vestibule architecture, not directly related to infection by the HPV in agreement with others [6,9,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Based on our findings, we believe that papillomatosis of the vulvar vestibule should not be treated, avoiding unnecessary procedures in this way, as well as harmful emotional reactions on part of the patients, many still virgins, who may erroneously presume themselves infected by a neoplasm-inducing and sexually transmissible virus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We consider papillomatosis of the vulvar vestibule as a normal variant in the vulvar vestibule architecture, not directly related to infection by the HPV in agreement with others [6,9,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Based on our findings, we believe that papillomatosis of the vulvar vestibule should not be treated, avoiding unnecessary procedures in this way, as well as harmful emotional reactions on part of the patients, many still virgins, who may erroneously presume themselves infected by a neoplasm-inducing and sexually transmissible virus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our case met the clinical criteria for VVP proposed by Moyal-Barracco et al . [ 2 ] Our diagnosis was confirmed dermoscopically. Our patient’s dermatoscopy revealed multiple cylindrical projections distributed regularly, each with a separate base, confirming our diagnosis.…”
Section: Case Reportssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The projections have conglomerate vascular structures and are more white and broader than vestibular papillae; this might correlate with the hyperkeratotic and acanthotic features of condyloma acuminata (Fig 3). Therefore, along with the five clinical parameters suggested by Moyal-Barranco et al, 3 we believe that characteristic dermatoscopic findings provide additional diagnostic clues to differentiate vestibular papillae from condyloma acuminata. Because vestibular papillae are unfamiliar to clinicians, they may be misdiagnosed as condyloma acuminata, leading to inappropriate treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
