2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of Stress Components Determined by Experimental Methods Using Airy Stress Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering mean stress σ m modified version of the stress amplitude (using Goodman, Soderberg, Geber), eq. 2 can be rewritten as follows [16,17] ( )…”
Section: Multi-level Fatigue Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering mean stress σ m modified version of the stress amplitude (using Goodman, Soderberg, Geber), eq. 2 can be rewritten as follows [16,17] ( )…”
Section: Multi-level Fatigue Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If k=1 and R F =R E (yield stress) the Soderberg´s model is used, if k=1 and R F =R M (strength limit) the Goodman´s model is used and if k=2 and R F =R M the Geber´s model is used. Using the linear Palmgren-Miner law we can calculate fatigue damage for stress amplitude σ Aj as follows [16]…”
Section: Multi-level Fatigue Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a lot of engineering structure components usually undergo a non-proportional and multiaxial loading. The application of the cyclic σ-ε tensor response under the multiaxial loading, which depends on the loading-path, is very difficult [2,5,11]. Several researchers have proposed uniaxial and multiaxial fatigue criteria based on an energy evaluation [7,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%