2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal coding and the storage of form-position associations in visual–spatial short-term memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to bear in mind that locating objects to their correct locations would be expected to be more difficult than remembering object identity or location alone (Postma and De Haan, 1996; Dent and Smyth, 2005). Therefore ceiling effects could theoretically lead to identification and localization performance being similar in patients and controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to bear in mind that locating objects to their correct locations would be expected to be more difficult than remembering object identity or location alone (Postma and De Haan, 1996; Dent and Smyth, 2005). Therefore ceiling effects could theoretically lead to identification and localization performance being similar in patients and controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A condition in which cues would have utility to structure an environmental task field in a fixed orientation could be when multiple target locations are presented and have to be held in memory. Clearly, the more target locations have to be held in memory, the greater the demands on working memory, as verified by studies in which having to remember more object locations results in poorer memory for location (Dent & Smyth, 2005). Holding multiple locations in memory might then induce the reliance on available cues in order to maintain memory for multiple targets and enhance memory performance.…”
Section: Implications For Other Spatial Tasksmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We predicted better memory when memory load was low. This prediction follows from short-term studies in which having to remember more object locations results in poorer memory for location (Dent & Smyth, 2005). Additionally, it follows from the idea that holding multiple locations in memory could serve to interfere with memory for any given target and hence lead to poorer memory performance.…”
Section: Human Analog Of the Morris Water Mazementioning
confidence: 92%