2018
DOI: 10.5194/esd-9-1107-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varying soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks explain divergent temperature extremes and precipitation projections in central Europe

Abstract: Abstract. The frequency and intensity of climate extremes is expected to increase in many regions due to anthropogenic climate change. In central Europe extreme temperatures are projected to change more strongly than global mean temperatures, and soil moisture–temperature feedbacks significantly contribute to this regional amplification. Because of their strong societal, ecological and economic impacts, robust projections of temperature extremes are needed. Unfortunately, in current model projections, temperat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
71
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
4
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the estimated ET reductions in central Europe strongly depend on the choice of GCMs considered in the GCM-RCM model chains. This large uncertainty in the estimated ET reductions in central Europe is likely connected to the divergent ET trend projections by GCMs in this region (Vogel et al 2018). In contrast, the different ET reduction estimates agree well in northern and southern Europe, which gives confidence in the robustness of the estimated plant physiological effect on ET in these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the estimated ET reductions in central Europe strongly depend on the choice of GCMs considered in the GCM-RCM model chains. This large uncertainty in the estimated ET reductions in central Europe is likely connected to the divergent ET trend projections by GCMs in this region (Vogel et al 2018). In contrast, the different ET reduction estimates agree well in northern and southern Europe, which gives confidence in the robustness of the estimated plant physiological effect on ET in these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While the ET reductions in northern and southern Europe caused by stomatal adaptation are robust across models, the effects in central Europe are more uncertain, ranging from small to potentially very large ET decreases (figure 2). The high uncertainty stems from ET reductions being very sensitive to the selection of GCMs in central Europe and thus mainly reflects the divergent ET trend projections by GCMs in this region (Vogel et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When projected results are used for decision-making, the uncertainty range sourced from intermember (Figure 5a shadings)/intermodel (Figures 2 and 3 shadings) spreads should be kept in mind and communicated explicitly. Increasingly available global-scale daily observations and growing maturation of observation-constrained techniques are promising to help reduce uncertainties of projected changes of extremes (Borodina et al, 2017;Vogel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In moisture-limited regions, including continental Europe (Fischer et al 2007, Vogel et al 2018 and north-eastern Australia (Nicholls 2004, King et al 2014a, there is a strong inverse relationship between summertime precipitation and temperature indices. Indeed, in Europe this has been used to attempt to constrain model projections (Vogel et al 2018) and a similar approach is undertaken here, whereby the most accurate models for observed summer precipitation-temperature (P-T) relationships are selected ( figure 4(b), supplementary table S2) and projections are produced. This approach tends to remove the models with the stronger nonlinearities in temperature projections ( figure 4(b)).…”
Section: Global Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%